Skip to main content

The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It » Chapter 4: Th...

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Groups (2)

Bookmark History

Saved by 4 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-04-24


Public Comment

on 2008-05-01 by renataavila

"The Network has a physical layer a protocol layer and and a social/content layer"

Public Sticky notes

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

three layers.

Highlighted by renataavila

three layers

Highlighted by renataavila

hierarchies

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

principle at work

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

Generativity is a system’s capacity to produce unanticipated change through unfiltered contributions from broad and varied audiences.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

consumers

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

f code.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

specialized

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

training

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

accessible

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

generative

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

frequently generativity at one layer is the best recipe for generativity at the layer above.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

generates

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

Free software satisfies Richard Stallman’s benchmark “four freedoms”: freedom to run the program, freedom to study how it works, freedom to change it, and freedom to share the results with the public at large

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

generative

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

platform

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

detail

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

Generative systems facilitate change.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

breakthrough

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

compete

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

market model.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

initial spark

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

They represent tinkering done by that one person in a hundred or a thousand who is so immersed in an activity or pursuit that improving it would make a big difference—a person who is prepared to experiment with a level of persistence that calls to mind the Roadrunner’s nemesis, Wile E. Coyote.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

The genius behind such innovations is truly inspiration rather than perspiration, a bit of tinkering with a crazy idea rather than a carefully planned and executed invention responding to clear market demand.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

Web service

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

Generativity, then, is a parent of invention, and an open network connecting generative devices makes the fruits of invention easy to share if the inventor is so inclined.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

He then noted the innate value of being able to express oneself idiosyncratically

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

We are seeing the possibility of an emergence of a new popular culture, produced on the folk-culture model and inhabited actively, rather than passively consumed by the masses.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

makers

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

policy issues

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

innovation

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

The divide is not between technology and nontechnology, but between hierarchy and polyarchy.72 In hierarchies, gatekeepers control the allocation of attention and resources to an idea. In polyarchies, many ideas can be pursued independently. Hierarchical systems appear better at nipping dead-end ideas in the bud, but they do so at the expense of crazy ideas that just might work. Polyarchies can result in wasted energy and effort, but they are better at ferreting out and developing obscure, transformative ideas. More importantly, they allow many more people to have a hand at contributing to the system, regardless of the quality of the contribution.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

contribution

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

eccentric

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

Internet

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

In hierarchies, gatekeepers control the allocation of attention and resources to an idea. In polyarchies, many ideas can be pursued independently. Hierarchical systems appear better at nipping dead-end ideas in the bud, but they do so at the expense of crazy ideas that just might work. Polyarchies can result in wasted energy and effort, but they are better at ferreting out and developing obscure, transformative ideas. More importantly, they allow many more people to have a hand at contributing to the system, regardless of the quality of the contribution.

Highlighted by tedperl

In hierarchies, gatekeepers control the allocation of attention and resources to an idea. In polyarchies, many ideas can be pursued independently. Hierarchical systems appear better at nipping dead-end ideas in the bud, but they do so at the expense of crazy ideas that just might work. Polyarchies can result in wasted energy and effort, but they are better at ferreting out and developing obscure, transformative ideas. More importantly, they allow many more people to have a hand at contributing to the system, regardless of the quality of the contribution.

Highlighted by tedperl

Most of Mill’s passion for individuality was channeled into a spirited defense of free speech and free thinking, not free building—and certainly not free programming.

Highlighted by tedperl

disruption

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

economic harm.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

But society has now fairly got the better of individuality; and the danger which threatens human nature is not the excess, but the deficiency, of personal impulses and preferences.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

The generative Internet and PC were at first perhaps more akin to new societies; as people were connected, they may not have had firm expectations about the basics of the interaction. Who pays for what? Who shares what? The time during which the Internet remained an academic backwater, and the PC was a hobbyist’s tool, helped situate each within the norms of Benkler’s parallel economy of sharing nicely, of greater control in the hands of users and commensurate trust that they would not abuse it.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

This is the generative pattern, and we can find examples of it at every layer of the network hourglass:

123

  1. An idea originates in a backwater.
  2. It is ambitious but incomplete. It is partially implemented and released anyway, embracing the ethos of the procrastination principle.
  3. Contribution is welcomed from all corners, resulting in an influx of usage.
  4. Success is achieved beyond any expectation, and a higher profile draws even more usage.
  5. Success is cut short: “There goes the neighborhood” as newer users are not conversant with the idea of experimentation and contribution, and other users are prepared to exploit the openness of the system to undesirable ends.
  6. There is movement toward enclosure to prevent the problems that arise from the system’s very popularity.

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice

surfing

Highlighted by tonycurzonprice