apophenia: The Economist Debate on Social "Networking"
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Groups (1)
-
Apple Distinguished Educators
31 members,292 bookmarks
This is a group for ADEs who love to bookmark!
Bookmark History
Saved by 30 people (1 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-01-16
- Mkm420fritz on 2008-04-08 - Tags socialnetworking , students , debate , blogging , teaching , education
- Betterannamac on 2008-03-27 - Tags education , facebook , myspace , pedagogy , socialnetworking , teaching
- Jdblack64 on 2008-03-26 - Tags socialnetworking
- Digitalnative on 2008-03-25 - Tags Social , education , networking , web2.0
- Elemenous on 2008-03-25 - Tags networking , social
Public Sticky notes
The Economist Debate on Social "Networking"
Highlighted by jason4myers
In their current incarnation, social network sites (SNSs) like Facebook and MySpace should not be integrated directly into the classroom. That said, they provide youth with a valuable networked public space to gather with their peers.
Highlighted by forestfortrees
SNSs do not make youth engage educationally; they allow educationally-motivated youth with a structure to engage educationally.
Highlighted by forestfortrees
Social network sites do not help most youth see beyond their social walls. Because most youth do not engage in "networking," they do not meet new people or see the world from a different perspective. Social network sites reinforce everyday networks, providing a gathering space when none previously existed.
Highlighted by jimfolk
Educational pedagogy has swung over the years between focusing on individual-centered learning, group learning, and peer-to-peer learning. If you take a peer-to-peer learning approach, you are inherently valuing the social networks that youth have and maintain, or else you are encouraging them to build one. These networks are mediated and reinforced through SNSs. If there is pedagogical value to encouraging peers to have strong social networks, then there is pedagogical value in supporting their sociable practices on SNSs.
Highlighted by joel
If there is pedagogical value to encouraging peers to have strong social networks, then there is pedagogical value in supporting their sociable practices on SNSs
Highlighted by jimfolk
When it comes to socializing with friends, youth prefer in-person (unregulated) encounters. They turn to SNSs when they can't get together with their friends en masse or when they can't get together without surveilling adults.
Highlighted by jimfolk
This not to say that technology doesn't belong in the classroom. Information access tools like Wikipedia and Google are tremendously valuable for getting access to content and should be strongly encouraged and taught through the lens of media literacy. Email, IM, or other communication tools can be super useful for distributing content to the group or between individuals or even providing a channel for group discussion (in-class or out). Blogging tools and group sharing tools are also quite valuable. Having to produce for the group instead of the teacher can work as a powerful incentive; most youth don't want to be embarrassed in front of their peers and pressure to perform can be leveraged to the teacher's advantage. But why social network sites? To the degree that they support blogging and group sharing, sure... but that's not the key point of them at all. They key features that make them unique are: profiles plus visible, articulated and surfable friends' lists. I simply don't get why these are of value in the classroom.
Highlighted by joel


Public Comment