CDI WICD 2.0
Popularity Report
 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rank
Groups (2)
-
Document Wars
8 members,364 bookmarks
Document Wars covers the portable XML document battle between OpenDocument, Office Open XML, and CDF, the W3C's Compound Document Format. The relationship to the Grand Convergence of desktop, server, device and web systems will be decisive, with application independence and universal interoperabili
-
OpenDocument
21 members,377 bookmarks
A collection of comments and discussions concerning OpenDocument and the challenge presented by Microsoft's Office Open XML.
Bookmark History
Public Sticky notes
This document defines a generic language-independent processing model for combining arbitrary document formats.
The Compound Document Framework is language-independent. While it is clearly meant to serve as the basis for integrating W3C's family of XML formats within its Interaction Domain (e.g., MathML, SMIL, SVG, VoiceXML, XForms, XHTML, XSL) with each other, together with CSS and the DOM; it can also be used to integrate non-W3C formats with W3C formats or integrate non-W3C formats with other non-W3C formats.
1.1. Conformance
Everying in this specification is normative except for diagrams, examples, notes and sections marked non-normative.
The key words must, must not, required, shall, shall not, should, should not, recommended, may and optional in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
This specification defines the following classes of products:
- conforming implementation
- A user agent that implements all interfaces described in this specification and follows all must-, required- and shall-level of critera in this specification.
- conforming document
- A document that follows all must-, required- and shall-level of critera in this specification that apply to document authors.
- conforming authoring tool
- One that produces conforming documents.
Highlighted by garyedwards
Public Comment