Toronto's year of living large - and tall (Toronto Star)
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 1 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-12-31
- Lampertina on 2007-12-31 - Tags architecture , christopher_hume , cities , museums , public_buildings , public_space , toronto , urbanism
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina
On the other hand, the much-delayed Metropolis at the northeast corner of Yonge and Dundas turned out to be a dud.
Though it forms one edge of the square, and occupies land on a major downtown intersection, it seems oblivious to anything beyond its own banality.
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2007-12-31 by lampertina
- would love more info on the dud: why it doesn't work, what's wrong with it, how it could have been better...
Further north, the city's love affair with the condo tower reached new heights; a tower at Yonge and Bloor will stand 80 storeys tall and a second, at Yonge and Gerrard, 75 storeys.
Though neither tower could be described as architecturally exciting, both are presentable. At the same time, however, most development happened in the vacuum that passes for planning in Toronto.
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2007-12-31 by lampertina
- another interesting difference: that T.O. has this Ontario Municipal Board, which can override council's land use decisions...
Highlighted by lampertina


Public Comment