Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 1 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-01-02
- Lampertina on 2008-01-02 - Tags amalgamation , downloading , local_government , municipal_funding , toronto
Public Sticky notes
Urbanists and planners flocked to the city to study its transit, the co-existence of its multicultural citizens and its two-tier government that thrived even as U.S. jurisdictions clung to tax-defined borders.
If anything, Toronto's intelligentsia hated the Metro government. It was big, less susceptible to ratepayer influence and had majority political representation from the suburbs of Scarborough, North York and Etobicoke.
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-01-02 by lampertina
I don't understand the transition(s) here: urbanists & planners study T.O., but the intelligentsia hated the Metro (amalgamated) idea?
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-01-02 by lampertina
- this is eerily similar to how Victoria has been shaping up, with the CRD acting as the "Metro"
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-01-02 by lampertina
- bingo.
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-01-02 by lampertina
- key point: downloading? amalgamation? systemic anyway?
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-01-02 by lampertina
- re. protests against downloading
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-01-02 by lampertina
- this part I don't get (since I don't know T.O. well): 12 neighbourhood councils better than four community councils? Really?
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-01-02 by lampertina
- probably wants more of a "strong mayor" model, which in Canada has been non-existent thus far


Public Comment