Cheater or Collaborator?
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 12 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2009-07-01
- Buella on 2009-10-03 - Tags collaboration , socialbookmarking , edes501
- Scedge on 2009-07-20 - Tags collaboration , ethics , socialbookmarking
- Sheasmith on 2009-07-09 - Tags collaboration , cheating , socialbookmarking , ethics
- S0793898 on 2009-07-09 - Tags plagiarism
- Dmantz7 on 2009-07-08 - Tags collaboration , collaborator , cheating , ethics , socialbookmarking , socialnetwork , professionaldevelopment , digitalcitizenship , administrator , all_teachers , bestpractices , edu_trends , techintegrator , web2
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by brasst
Highlighted by brasst
Highlighted by brasst
on 2009-07-01 by brasst
For most behaviors online, there's a corresponding offline behavior that could give digital immigrants a frame of reference. I find this analogy interesting because they are, at least on the surface, similar. The more I think about it, it shows the flaw in past (and in some case current) practice. Teachers need to have a clear concept of what their desired outcomes are - is it learning to research? learning about the concept? a little of both? This should guide what the right/wrong of the situation might be and should be communicated clearly to students. It will help clear the haze for all involved. Few kids would intentionally violate an honor code or their teachers' expectations; it's the teachers' responsibility to structure the assignment in such a way that his or her outcomes are well-understood by all.
Highlighted by dmantz7
Highlighted by brasst


Public Comment