Twitter Wouldn’t Sell For $1 Billion, Says Source
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Bookmark History
Saved by 6 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2009-04-03
- Somecallmetim on 2009-04-06 - Tags twitter , google , m&a
- Imartin on 2009-04-04 - Tags gerücht , gerüchte , gespräche , google , microblogging , rumours , twitter , verkauf
- Marclijour on 2009-04-04 - Tags twitter , google , microblogging
- Chasjo on 2009-04-04 - Tags no_tag
- Jhlundin on 2009-04-03 - Tags google , twitter
Public Sticky notes
The deal Google wants: a real time feed of Twitter updates to speed indexing. Without that feed Google must independently index each Twitter user periodically to look for updates. That means it’s dreadfully slow in grabbing all those Twitter posts. And it’s also very expensive from a computing resource standpoint. A real time feed would be of huge value to Google, and they’d be smart to nail down a long term deal sooner rather than later.
Highlighted by somecallmetim
It would be a coup for Google to get the Twitter milk without having to buy the cow. The real question is, does Twitter fully understand the value of this feed?
Highlighted by somecallmetim


Public Comment