Skip to main content

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Bookmark History

Saved by 22 people (-11 private), first by anonymouse user on 2006-03-02


Public Comment

on 2005-12-30 by jakkaball

Interesting time management theory.

on 2006-03-04 by gibarian

How to actually get stuff done.

on 2006-09-19 by kazwell

spend 50% of my work time on A tasks, 30% on B tasks, and 20% on C tasks. Assuming an 8 hour day = ~4 hours on A tasks, ~2 hours on B tasks, and ~1.5 on C tasks - the time boundary for C tasks is an upper limit.

Public Sticky notes

A tasks are expected to yield significant benefits over a 5-year time span and beyond. This could include starting a new business, writing a book, changing my diet, adding a new passive income stream, etc. It’s perfectly fine for an A task to start producing benefits in a shorter period of time, but the idea is that I expect such tasks to still be having a lasting impact 5+ years from now. This has to be a genuinely realistic expectation, not just wishful thinking.

Highlighted by joel

It’s the long-term strategy of writing and content development (A task) that makes the difference in this time span.

Highlighted by mounirra

spend less time on those activities in order to reinvest it in what matters most. Otherwise those little tasks will crowd out the more important ones

Highlighted by mounirra

The reason to invest in A tasks is to capitalize on long-term opportunities

Highlighted by mounirra

The reason to invest in C tasks is to prevent problems

Highlighted by mounirra

n most cases there’s no real benefit to doing a great job vs. doing an adequate job — the time difference would be better reallocated to A and B tasks.

Highlighted by mounirra

Organizing and optimizing would usually fall into the B class. B tasks help put you in a position to capitalize on bigger A task opportunities

Highlighted by mounirra