The 50-30-20 Rule
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 22 people (-11 private), first by anonymouse user on 2006-03-02
- Ianhow243 on 2008-12-27 - Tags no_tag
- Mounirra on 2008-07-29 - Tags no_tag
- Kabell on 2007-01-22 - Tags productivity , gtd , management , time , article , organization , motivation , stevepavlina
- Justthedba on 2006-11-13 - Tags productivity
- Ian29s on 2006-10-05 - Tags howto , learning , tips , lifehacks
Public Sticky notes
A tasks
are expected to yield significant benefits over a 5-year time span and beyond. This could include starting a new business, writing a book, changing my diet, adding a new passive income stream, etc. It’s perfectly fine for an A task to start producing benefits in a shorter period of time, but the idea is that I expect such tasks to still be having a lasting impact 5+ years from now. This has to be a genuinely realistic expectation, not just wishful thinking.
Highlighted by joel
It’s the long-term strategy of writing and content development (A task) that makes the difference in this time span.
Highlighted by mounirra
spend less time on those activities in order to reinvest it in what matters most. Otherwise those little tasks will crowd out the more important ones
Highlighted by mounirra
The reason to invest in A tasks is to capitalize on long-term opportunities
Highlighted by mounirra
The reason to invest in C tasks is to prevent problems
Highlighted by mounirra
n most cases there’s no real benefit to doing a great job vs. doing an adequate job — the time difference would be better reallocated to A and B tasks.
Highlighted by mounirra
Organizing and optimizing would usually fall into the B class. B tasks help put you in a position to capitalize on bigger A task opportunities
Highlighted by mounirra


Public Comment
on 2005-12-30 by jakkaball
on 2006-03-04 by gibarian
on 2006-09-19 by kazwell