Skip to main content

How we read online. - By Michael Agger - Slate Magazine

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Bookmark History

Saved by 69 people (-19 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-06-14


Public Comment

on 2009-01-23 by cartierm

LOL. SOOO TRUE!

Public Sticky notes

I suppose ludic readers would be the little sloths hiding in the jungle while everyone else is out rampaging around for fresh meat.

Highlighted by fichter

I suppose ludic readers would be the little sloths hiding in the jungle while everyone else is out rampaging around for fresh meat.

Highlighted by fichter

I suppose ludic readers would be the little sloths hiding in the jungle while everyone else is out rampaging around for fresh meat.

Highlighted by fichter

You're probably going to read this.

It's a short paragraph at the top of the page. It's surrounded by white space. It's in small type.

To really get your attention, I should write like this:

  • Bulleted list
  • Occasional use of bold to prevent skimming
  • Short sentence fragments
  • Explanatory subheads
  • No puns
  • Did I mention lists?

Highlighted by wroush

On the Internet, we hunt for facts. In earlier days, when switching between sites was time-consuming, we tended to stay in one place and dig. Now we assess a site quickly, looking for an "information scent."

Highlighted by cawilkin

Now we assess a site quickly, looking for an "information scent." We move on if there doesn't seem to be any food around.

Highlighted by cartierm

Bye. Have fun on Facebook.

Highlighted by jbronstein

The studies are not definitive, however, given all the factors that can affect online reading, such as scrolling, font size, user expertise, etc. Nielsen holds that on-screen reading is 25 percent slower than reading on paper.

Highlighted by cartierm

Avoid MySpace.

Highlighted by jbronstein

Moby Dick has become a spa.

Highlighted by prodik