How we read online. - By Michael Agger - Slate Magazine
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 69 people (-19 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-06-14
- Prodik on 2009-08-30 - Tags no_tag
- Cawilkin on 2009-07-30 - Tags no_tag
- R4ph4el on 2009-05-05 - Tags reading , Slate , writing , usability , web , Design , blogging , webdesign , Nielsen
- Jurijmlotman on 2009-04-08 - Tags screenreading , screenliteracy , digital_literacy , skyreading , deli
- Samgliksman on 2009-04-07 - Tags reading , writing , web , blogging , webdesign
Public Sticky notes
I suppose ludic readers would be the little sloths hiding in the jungle while everyone else is out rampaging around for fresh meat.
Highlighted by fichter
I suppose ludic readers would be the little sloths hiding in the jungle while everyone else is out rampaging around for fresh meat.
Highlighted by fichter
I suppose ludic readers would be the little sloths hiding in the jungle while everyone else is out rampaging around for fresh meat.
Highlighted by fichter
You're probably going to read this.
It's a short paragraph at the top of the page. It's surrounded by white space. It's in small type.
To really get your attention, I should write like this:
- Bulleted list
- Occasional use of bold to prevent skimming
- Short sentence fragments
- Explanatory subheads
- No puns
- Did I mention lists?
Highlighted by wroush
On the Internet, we hunt for facts. In earlier days, when switching between sites was time-consuming, we tended to stay in one place and dig. Now we assess a site quickly, looking for an "information scent."
Highlighted by cawilkin
Now we assess a site quickly, looking for an "information scent." We move on if there doesn't seem to be any food around.
Highlighted by cartierm
Bye. Have fun on Facebook.
Highlighted by jbronstein
The studies are not definitive, however, given all the factors that can affect online reading, such as scrolling, font size, user expertise, etc. Nielsen holds that on-screen reading is 25 percent slower than reading on paper.
Highlighted by cartierm
Avoid MySpace.
Highlighted by jbronstein


Public Comment
on 2009-01-23 by cartierm