Next-generation heart stent beats older device | Science | Re...
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Bookmark History
Saved by 1 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-04-23
- Unnikrishna on 2008-04-23 - Tags no_tag
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by unnikrishna
Highlighted by unnikrishna
Highlighted by unnikrishna
Results of the company-funded study of 1,000 patients known as Spirit III pitted Abbott's Xience against Boston Scientific Corp's Taxus stent. Xience proved significantly better at preventing scar tissue from renarrowing treated vessels, a measure known as in-segment late loss.
It also worked as well as Taxus in reducing rates of target vessel failure, a measure of re-treatment needed either because the device did not work or because of heart attacks or death.
And it cut major adverse cardiac events -- including heart attacks and heart-related deaths -- by 42 percent after one year.
Highlighted by unnikrishna


Public Comment