Skip to main content

O'Reilly -- What Is Web 2.0

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Related Lists

Bookmark History

Saved by 41 people (-9 private), first by anonymouse user on 2006-05-06


Public Comment

on 2006-08-22 by getsheila

vive la revolution!

Public Sticky notes

eBay's product is the collective activity of all its users; like the web itself, eBay grows organically in response to user activity, and the company's role is as an enabler of a context in which that user activity can happen. What's more, eBay's competitive advantage comes almost entirely from the critical mass of buyers and sellers, which makes any new entrant offering similar services significantly less attractive.

Highlighted by slacker

"the long tail," the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web's content.

Highlighted by mwesch

Harnessing Collective Intelligence

Highlighted by mwesch

Hyperlinking is the foundation of the web. As users add new content, and new sites, it is bound in to the structure of the web by other users discovering the content and linking to it. Much as synapses form in the brain, with associations becoming stronger through repetition or intensity, the web of connections grows organically as an output of the collective activity of all web users.

Highlighted by mwesch

eBay's product is the collective activity of all its users; like the web itself, eBay grows organically in response to user activity, and the company's role is as an enabler of a context in which that user activity can happen. What's more, eBay's competitive advantage comes almost entirely from the critical mass of buyers and sellers, which makes any new entrant offering similar services significantly less attractive.

Highlighted by mwesch

a radical experiment in trust, applying Eric Raymond's dictum (originally coined in the context of open source software) that "with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow," to content creation. Wikipedia

Highlighted by mwesch

Tagging allows for the kind of multiple, overlapping associations that the brain itself uses, rather than rigid categories.

Highlighted by mwesch

collective, net-enabled intelligence

Highlighted by mwesch

they have embraced the power of the web to harness collective intelligence

Highlighted by ixeman

BitTorrent, like other pioneers in the P2P movement, takes a radical approach to internet decentralization. Every client is also a server; files are broken up into fragments that can be served from multiple locations, transparently harnessing the network of downloaders to provide both bandwidth and data to other users. The more popular the file, in fact, the faster it can be served, as there are more users providing bandwidth and fragments of the complete file.

Highlighted by shijay

peer-production

Highlighted by shijay

Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia based on the unlikely notion that an entry can be added by any web user, and edited by any other, is a radical experiment in trust, applying Eric Raymond's dictum (originally coined in the context of open source software) that "with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow,"

Highlighted by logosfails

Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia based on the unlikely notion that an entry can be added by any web user, and edited by any other, is a radical experiment in trust, applying Eric Raymond's dictum (originally coined in the context of > open source software > ) that "with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow," >

Highlighted by logosfails

Collaborative spam filtering products like Cloudmark aggregate the individual decisions of email users about what is and is not spam, outperforming systems that rely on analysis of the messages themselves.

Highlighted by logosfails

t is a truism that the greatest internet success stories don't advertise their products. Their adoption is driven by "viral marketing"--that is, recommendations propagating directly from one user to another. You can almost make the case that if a site or product relies on advertising to get the word out, it isn't Web 2.0.

Highlighted by logosfails

This time, though, the clash isn't between a platform and an application, but between two platforms, each with a radically different business model: On the one side, a single software provider, whose massive installed base and tightly integrated operating system and APIs give control over the programming paradigm; on the other, a system without an owner, tied together by a set of protocols, open standards and agreements for cooperation.

Windows represents the pinnacle of proprietary control via software APIs. Netscape tried to wrest control from Microsoft using the same techniques that Microsoft itself had used against other rivals, and failed. But Apache, which held to the open standards of the web, has prospered. The battle is no longer unequal, a platform versus a single application, but platform versus platform, with the question being which platform, and more profoundly, which architecture, and which business model, is better suited to the opportunity ahead.

Highlighted by avera2000

DoubleClick's offerings require a formal sales contract, limiting their market to the few thousand largest websites. Overture and Google figured out how to enable ad placement on virtually any web page. What's more, they eschewed publisher/ad-agency friendly advertising formats such as banner ads and popups in favor of minimally intrusive, context-sensitive, consumer-friendly text advertising

Highlighted by avera2000

Like DoubleClick, Akamai is optimized to do business with the head, not the tail, with the center, not the edges. While it serves the benefit of the individuals at the edge of the web by smoothing their access to the high-demand sites at the center, it collects its revenue from those central sites.

Highlighted by avera2000

the service automatically gets better the more people use i

Highlighted by orlamoeller

Network effects from user contributions are the key to market dominance in the Web 2.0 era

Highlighted by orlamoeller

leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head. >

Highlighted by orlamoeller

Google's success came from an understanding of what Chris Anderson refers to as "the long tail," the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web's content.

Highlighted by furler5

Google's success came from an understanding of what Chris Anderson refers to as "the long tail," the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web's content.

Highlighted by furler5

Google's success came from an understanding of what Chris Anderson refers to as "the long tail," the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web's content.

Highlighted by furler5

It bought into the '90s notion that the web was about publishing, not participation; that advertisers, not consumers, ought to call the shots; that size mattered, and that the internet was increasingly being dominated by the top websites as measured by MediaMetrix and other web ad scoring companies.

Highlighted by fadimaali

has a core competency in data management, and, as noted above, was a pioneer in web services long before web services even had a name

Highlighted by pbirnie

However, DoubleClick was ultimately limited by its business model. It bought into the '90s notion that the web was about publishing, not participation; that advertisers, not consumers, ought to call the shots; that size mattered, and that the internet was increasingly being dominated by the top websites as measured by MediaMetrix and other web ad scoring companies.

Highlighted by jonadon

'90s notion that the web was about publishing, not participation

Highlighted by pbirnie

Overture and Google's success came from an understanding of what Chris Anderson refers to as "the long tail," the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web's content. DoubleClick's offerings require a formal sales contract, limiting their market to the few thousand largest websites. Overture and Google figured out how to enable ad placement on virtually any web page. What's more, they eschewed publisher/ad-agency friendly advertising formats such as banner ads and popups in favor of minimally intrusive, context-sensitive, consumer-friendly text advertising.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

Overture and Google's success came from an understanding of what Chris Anderson refers to as "the long tail," the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web's content.

Highlighted by jonadon

"the long tail," the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web's content.

Highlighted by persei

"the long tail," the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web's content

Highlighted by pbirnie

consumer-friendly text advertising

Highlighted by jonadon

The Web 2.0 lesson: leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

The Web 2.0 lesson: leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head.

Highlighted by jmotter

The Web 2.0 lesson: leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head.

Highlighted by chatfieldteacher

90s notion that the web was about publishing, not participation; that advertisers, not consumers, ought to call the shots

Highlighted by bitsun

The Web 2.0 lesson: leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head.

Highlighted by jonadon

The Web 2.0 lesson: leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head

Highlighted by mxs814

The Web 2.0 lesson: leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head.

Highlighted by garywo

eBay enables

Highlighted by jonadon

Napster (though shut down for legal reasons) built its network not by building a centralized song database, but by architecting a system in such a way that every downloader also became a server, and thus grew the network.

Highlighted by jmotter

A Platform Beats an Application Every Time

In each of its past confrontations with rivals, Microsoft has successfully played the platform card, trumping even the most dominant applications.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

Napster

Highlighted by jonadon

leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head

Highlighted by fadimaali

by architecting a system in such a way that every downloader also became a server, and thus grew the network.

Highlighted by mxs814

very downloader also became a server, and thus grew the network.

Highlighted by pbirnie

Akamai is optimized to do business with the head, not the tail, with the center, not the edges.

Highlighted by jmotter

Windows allowed Microsoft to displace Lotus 1-2-3 with Excel, WordPerfect with Word, and Netscape Navigator with Internet Explorer.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

"the long tail," the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web's content.

Highlighted by bitsun

Chris Anderson

Highlighted by bitsun

BitTorrent, like other pioneers in the P2P movement, takes a radical approach to internet decentralization. Every client is also a server; files are broken up into fragments that can be served from multiple locations, transparently harnessing the network of downloaders to provide both bandwidth and data to other users. The more popular the file, in fact, the faster it can be served, as there are more users providing bandwidth and fragments of the complete file.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

BitTorrent, like other pioneers in the P2P movement, takes a radical approach to internet decentralization.

Highlighted by jmotter

This time, though, the clash isn't between a platform and an application, but between two platforms, each with a radically different business model: On the one side, a single software provider, whose massive installed base and tightly integrated operating system and APIs give control over the programming paradigm; on the other, a system without an owner, tied together by a set of protocols, open standards and agreements for cooperation.

Highlighted by mmarlatt

leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head.

Highlighted by bitsun

the service automatically gets better the more people use it

Highlighted by cll212

BitTorrent thus demonstrates a key Web 2.0 principle: the service automatically gets better the more people use it.

Highlighted by jonadon

Web 2.0 principle: the service automatically gets better the more people use it.

Highlighted by pbirnie

Windows represents the pinnacle of proprietary control via software APIs. Netscape tried to wrest control from Microsoft using the same techniques that Microsoft itself had used against other rivals, and failed. But Apache, which held to the open standards of the web, has prospered. The battle is no longer unequal, a platform versus a single application, but platform versus platform

Highlighted by sanilunlu

There's an implicit "architecture of participation", a built-in ethic of cooperation, in which the service acts primarily as an intelligent broker, connecting the edges to each other and harnessing the power of the users themselves.

Highlighted by pbirnie

a system without an owner

Highlighted by mxs814

There's an implicit "architecture of participation", a built-in ethic of cooperation, in which the service acts primarily as an intelligent broker, connecting the edges to each other and harnessing the power of the users themselves.

Highlighted by hel11mut

The central principle behind the success of the giants born in the Web 1.0 era who have survived to lead the Web 2.0 era appears to be this, that they have embraced the power of the web to harness collective intelligence:

Highlighted by chatfieldteacher

the service automatically gets better the more people use it

Highlighted by fadimaali

Hyperlinking is the foundation of the web.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

Hyperlinking is the foundation of the web. As users add new content, and new sites, it is bound in to the structure of the web by other users discovering the content and linking to it. Much as synapses form in the brain, with associations becoming stronger through repetition or intensity, the web of connections grows organically as an output of the collective activity of all web users.

Highlighted by kschwartz91

2. Harnessing Collective Intelligence

The central principle behind the success of the giants born in the Web 1.0 era who have survived to lead the Web 2.0 era appears to be this, that they have embraced the power of the web to harness collective intelligence:

Highlighted by mmarlatt

Much as synapses form in the brain, with associations becoming stronger through repetition or intensity, the web of connections grows organically as an output of the collective activity of all web users.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

that they have embraced the power of the web to harness collective intelligence:

Highlighted by persei

Google's breakthrough in search, which quickly made it the undisputed search market leader, was PageRank, a method of using the link structure of the web rather than just the characteristics of documents to provide better search results.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

the web of connections grows organically as an output of the collective activity of all web users.

Highlighted by pbirnie

But a single monolithic approach, controlled by a single vendor, is no longer a solution, it's a problem. Communications-oriented systems, as the internet-as-platform most certainly is, require interoperability.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

Yahoo!,

Highlighted by mmarlatt

Hyperlinking is the foundation of the web

Highlighted by zamarit

Much as synapses form in the brain, with associations becoming stronger through repetition or intensity, the web of connections grows organically as an output of the collective activity of all web users.

Highlighted by zamarit

  • eBay's product is the collective activity of all its users; like the web itself, eBay grows organically in response to user activity, and the company's role is as an enabler of a context in which that user activity can happen. What's more, eBay's competitive advantage comes almost entirely from the critical mass of buyers and sellers, which makes any new entrant offering similar services significantly less attractive.
  • Amazon sells the same products as competitors such as Barnesandnoble.com, and they receive the same product descriptions, cover images, and editorial content from their vendors. But Amazon has made a science of user engagement. They have an order of magnitude more user reviews, invitations to participate in varied ways on virtually every page--and even more importantly, they use user activity to produce better search results. While a Barnesandnoble.com search is likely to lead with the company's own products, or sponsored results, Amazon always leads with "most popular", a real-time computation based not only on sales but other factors that Amazon insiders call the "flow" around products. With an order of magnitude more user participation, it's no surprise that Amazon's sales also outpace competitors.
  • Highlighted by theron_d

    Amazon sells the same products as competitors such as Barnesandnoble.com, and they receive the same product descriptions, cover images, and editorial content from their vendors. But Amazon has made a science of user engagement. They have an order of magnitude more user reviews, invitations to participate in varied ways on virtually every page--and even more importantly, they use user activity to produce better search results.

    Highlighted by sanilunlu

    Google's breakthrough in search, which quickly made it the undisputed search market leader, was PageRank, a method of using the link structure of the web rather than just the characteristics of documents to provide better search results.

    Highlighted by pbirnie

    Unless a vendor can control both ends of every interaction, the possibilities of user lock-in via software APIs are limited.

    Highlighted by chatfieldteacher

    the service automatically gets better the more people use it.

    Highlighted by bitsun

    eBay's

    Highlighted by mmarlatt

    architecture of participation

    Highlighted by bitsun

    Any Web 2.0 vendor that seeks to lock in its application gains by controlling the platform will, by definition, no longer be playing to the strengths of the platform.

    Highlighted by jonadon

    Amazon

    Highlighted by mmarlatt

    Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia based on the unlikely notion that an entry can be added by any web user, and edited by any other, is a radical experiment in trust, applying Eric Raymond's dictum (originally coined in the context of open source software) that "with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow," to content creation.

    Highlighted by sanilunlu

    "with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow,"

    Highlighted by jonadon

    Amazon insiders call the "flow" around products.

    Highlighted by pbirnie

    Sites like del.icio.us and Flickr, two companies that have received a great deal of attention of late, have pioneered a concept that some people call "folksonomy" (in contrast to taxonomy), a style of collaborative categorization of sites using freely chosen keywords, often referred to as tags.

    Highlighted by jonadon

    PageRank, a method of using the link structure of the web rather than just the characteristics of documents to provide better search results.

    Highlighted by bitsun

    Sites like del.icio.us and Flickr, two companies that have received a great deal of attention of late, have pioneered a concept that some people call "folksonomy" (in contrast to taxonomy), a style of collaborative categorization of sites using freely chosen keywords, often referred to as tags.

    Highlighted by sanilunlu

    call "folksonomy" (in contrast to taxonomy), a style of collaborative categorization of sites using freely chosen keywords, often referred to as tags.

    Highlighted by chatfieldteacher

    Wikipedia

    Highlighted by mmarlatt

    is a radical experiment in trust

    Highlighted by elizandrews

    It is a truism that the greatest internet success stories don't advertise their products. Their adoption is driven by "viral marketing"--that is, recommendations propagating directly from one user to another.

    Highlighted by sanilunlu

    Cloudmark

    Highlighted by jonadon

    greatest internet success stories don't advertise their products. Their adoption is driven by "viral marketing"

    Highlighted by chatfieldteacher

    "with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow,"

    Highlighted by pbirnie

    It is a truism that the greatest internet success stories don't advertise their products. Their adoption is driven by "viral marketing"--that is, recommendations propagating directly from one user to another. You can almost make the case that if a site or product relies on advertising to get the word out, it isn't Web 2.0.

    Highlighted by jonadon

    Sites like del.icio.us and Flickr, two companies that have received a great deal of attention of late, have pioneered a concept that some people call "folksonomy" (in contrast to taxonomy), a style of collaborative categorization of sites using freely chosen keywords, often referred to as tags. Tagging allows for the kind of multiple, overlapping associations that the brain itself uses, rather than rigid categories. In the canonical example, a Flickr photo of a puppy might be tagged both "puppy" and "cute"--allowing for retrieval along natural axes generated user activity.

    Highlighted by glimm_er

    "folksonomy" (in contrast to taxonomy), a style of collaborative categorization of sites using freely chosen keywords, often referred to as tags

    Highlighted by pbirnie

    Sites like del.icio.us and Flickr, two companies that have received a great deal of attention of late, have pioneered a concept that some people call "folksonomy" (in contrast to taxonomy), a style of collaborative categorization of sites using freely chosen keywords, often referred to as tags.

    Highlighted by mmarlatt

    The lesson: Network effects from user contributions are the key to market dominance in the Web 2.0 era.

    Highlighted by chatfieldteacher

    It is a truism that the greatest internet success stories don't advertise their products. Their adoption is driven by "viral marketing"--that is, recommendations propagating directly from one user to another. You can almost make the case that if a site or product relies on advertising to get the word out, it isn't Web 2.0.

    Highlighted by pbirnie

    Network effects from user contributions

    Highlighted by mxs814