Skip to main content

O'Reilly: What Is Web 2.0

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Groups (2)

  • morfeu

    Morfeu

    5 members,15 bookmarks

    Grupo de desenvolvedores do Projeto Morfeu

  • ncushu

    ncushu

    43 members,171 bookmarks

    Professor Shu's teaching

Bookmark History

Saved by 96 people (21 private), first by anonymouse user on 2006-03-02


Public Comment

on 2006-04-13 by walter

(One of) the definitive articles

on 2006-07-17 by benny2891

What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software by Tim O'Reilly 09/30/2005

on 2006-08-18 by myfourwalls

o'reilly's article on web 2.0

on 2006-11-12 by drsnyder

Web 2.0 article

on 2007-01-18 by dhcmrlchtdj

A good introduction to Web 2.0 and why it's the next big thing

Public Sticky notes

Web 1.0   Web 2.0 DoubleClick --> Google AdSense Ofoto --> Flickr Akamai --> BitTorrent mp3.com --> Napster Britannica Online --> Wikipedia personal websites --> blogging evite --> upcoming.org and EVDB domain name speculation --> search engine optimization page views --> cost per click screen scraping --> web services publishing --> participation content management systems --> wikis directories (taxonomy) --> tagging ("folksonomy") stickiness --> syndication

Highlighted by johnchen

Web 2.0

Highlighted by polaris

Web2MemeMap

Highlighted by evareussner

What Is Web 2.0
Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software

by Tim O'Reilly
09/30/2005
Read this article in:

The bursting of the dot-com bubble in the fall of 2001 marked a turning point for the web. Many people concluded that the web was overhyped, when in fact bubbles and consequent shakeouts appear to be a common feature of all technological revolutions. Shakeouts typically mark the point at which an ascendant technology is ready to take its place at center stage. The pretenders are given the bum's rush, the real success stories show their strength, and there begins to be an understanding of what separates one from the other.

The concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International. Dale Dougherty, web pioneer and O'Reilly VP, noted that far from having "crashed", the web was more important than ever, with exciting new applications and sites popping up with surprising regularity. What's more, the companies that had survived the collapse seemed to have some things in common. Could it be that the dot-com collapse marked some kind of turning point for the web, such that a call to action such as "Web 2.0" might make sense? We agreed that it did, and so the Web 2.0 Conference was born.

Highlighted by gwedgwood

DoubleClick

Highlighted by orlamoeller

What Is Web 2.0
Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software

Highlighted by vegeba

1. The Web As Platform

Highlighted by vegeba

at the first Web 2.0 conference, in October 2004,

Highlighted by vegeba

Netscape vs. Google

Highlighted by vegeba

while some of the applications we identified as Web 2.0, like Napster and BitTorrent, are not even properly web applications!

Highlighted by vegeba

If Netscape was the standard bearer for Web 1.0, Google is most certainly the standard bearer for Web 2.0 > >

Highlighted by vegeba

etscape belonged to the same software world as Lotus, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP

Highlighted by vegeba

Google's fellows are other internet applications like eBay, Amazon, Napster, and yes, DoubleClick and Akamai

Highlighted by vegeba

Google's service is not a server

Highlighted by vegeba

nor a browser

Highlighted by vegeba

Nor d >oes its flagship search service even host the content that it enables users to find.

Highlighted by vegeba

Google, by contrast, began its life as a native web application

Highlighted by vegeba

delivered as a service

Highlighted by vegeba

heir flagship product was the web browser

Highlighted by vegeba

The concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International. Dale Dougherty, web pioneer and O'Reilly VP, noted that far from having "crashed", the web was more important than ever, with exciting new applications and sites popping up with surprising regularity. What's more, the companies that had survived the collapse seemed to have some things in common. Could it be that the dot-com collapse marked some kind of turning point for the web, such that a call to action such as "Web 2.0" might make sense?

Highlighted by orlamoeller

personal websites

Highlighted by orlamoeller

Britannica Online

Highlighted by orlamoeller

content management systems

Highlighted by orlamoeller

directories (taxonomy)

Highlighted by orlamoeller

What Is Web 2.0
Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software

Highlighted by jesuslongoria

What Is Web 2.0
Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software

Highlighted by mmarlatt

The bursting of the dot-com bubble in the fall of 2001 marked a turning point for the web.

Highlighted by markcmarino

Highlighted by ddddmurphy

Highlighted by ddddmurphy

Google, by contrast, began its life as a native web application, never sold or packaged, but delivered as a service, with customers paying, directly or indirectly, for the use of that service.

Highlighted by jahmount

At bottom, Google requires a competency that Netscape never needed: database management. Google isn't just a collection of software tools, it's a specialized database. Without the data, the tools are useless;

Highlighted by jahmount

Google happens in the space between browser and search engine and destination content server, as an enabler or middleman between the user and his or her online experience.

Highlighted by jahmount

Google happens in the space between browser and search engine and destination content server, as an enabler or middleman between the user and his or her online experience.

Highlighted by kschwartz91