Skip to main content

O'Reilly: What Is Web 2.0

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Bookmark History

Saved by 120 people (-30 private), first by anonymouse user on 2006-03-02


Public Comment

on 2006-04-13 by walter

(One of) the definitive articles

on 2006-07-17 by benny2891

What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software by Tim O'Reilly 09/30/2005

on 2006-08-18 by myfourwalls

o'reilly's article on web 2.0

on 2006-11-12 by drsnyder

Web 2.0 article

on 2007-01-18 by dhcmrlchtdj

A good introduction to Web 2.0 and why it's the next big thing

Public Sticky notes

Web 1.0   Web 2.0 DoubleClick --> Google AdSense Ofoto --> Flickr Akamai --> BitTorrent mp3.com --> Napster Britannica Online --> Wikipedia personal websites --> blogging evite --> upcoming.org and EVDB domain name speculation --> search engine optimization page views --> cost per click screen scraping --> web services publishing --> participation content management systems --> wikis directories (taxonomy) --> tagging ("folksonomy") stickiness --> syndication

Highlighted by johnchen

Web 2.0

Highlighted by polaris

What Is Web 2.0
Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software

by Tim O'Reilly
09/30/2005
Read this article in:

The bursting of the dot-com bubble in the fall of 2001 marked a turning point for the web. Many people concluded that the web was overhyped, when in fact bubbles and consequent shakeouts appear to be a common feature of all technological revolutions. Shakeouts typically mark the point at which an ascendant technology is ready to take its place at center stage. The pretenders are given the bum's rush, the real success stories show their strength, and there begins to be an understanding of what separates one from the other.

The concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International. Dale Dougherty, web pioneer and O'Reilly VP, noted that far from having "crashed", the web was more important than ever, with exciting new applications and sites popping up with surprising regularity. What's more, the companies that had survived the collapse seemed to have some things in common. Could it be that the dot-com collapse marked some kind of turning point for the web, such that a call to action such as "Web 2.0" might make sense? We agreed that it did, and so the Web 2.0 Conference was born.

Highlighted by gwedgwood

DoubleClick

Highlighted by orlamoeller

What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software

Highlighted by lvandeput

The concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International. Dale Dougherty, web pioneer and O'Reilly VP, noted that far from having "crashed", the web was more important than ever, with exciting new applications and sites popping up with surprising regularity. What's more, the companies that had survived the collapse seemed to have some things in common. Could it be that the dot-com collapse marked some kind of turning point for the web, such that a call to action such as "Web 2.0" might make sense?

Highlighted by orlamoeller

personal websites

Highlighted by orlamoeller

Britannica Online

Highlighted by orlamoeller

directories (taxonomy)

Highlighted by orlamoeller

content management systems

Highlighted by orlamoeller

What Is Web 2.0
Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software

Highlighted by mmarlatt

The bursting of the dot-com bubble in the fall of 2001 marked a turning point for the web.

Highlighted by markcmarino

Highlighted by ddddmurphy

Highlighted by ddddmurphy

The concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International.

Highlighted by chatfieldteacher

The concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

The concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International. Dale Dougherty, web pioneer and O'Reilly VP, noted that far from having "crashed", the web was more important than ever, with exciting new applications and sites popping up with surprising regularity. What's more, the companies that had survived the collapse seemed to have some things in common. Could it be that the dot-com collapse marked some kind of turning point for the web, such that a call to action such as "Web 2.0" might make sense? We agreed that it did, and so the Web 2.0 Conference was born.

Highlighted by gail_holmes

the dot-com collapse marked some kind of turning point for the web, such that a call to action such as "Web 2.0" might make sense?

Highlighted by chatfieldteacher

Could it be that the dot-com collapse marked some kind of turning point for the web, such that a call to action such as "Web 2.0" might make sense? We agreed that it did, and so the Web 2.0 Conference was born.

Highlighted by hel11mut

the new conventional wisdom

Highlighted by mxs814

on 2009-01-19 by mxs814

In what ways? Does it include ethical issues on Web?

1. The Web As Platform

Like many important concepts, Web 2.0 doesn't have a hard boundary, but rather, a gravitational core. You can visualize Web 2.0 as a set of principles and practices that tie together a veritable solar system of sites that demonstrate some or all of those principles, at a varying distance from that core.

Web2MemeMap

Figure 1 shows a "meme map" of Web 2.0 that was developed at a brainstorming session during FOO Camp, a conference at O'Reilly Media. It's very much a work in progress, but shows the many ideas that radiate out from the Web 2.0 core.

Highlighted by niklas_karlsson

the Web 2.0 meme

Highlighted by mxs814

a veritable solar system of sites

Highlighted by mxs814

a "meme map" of Web 2.0

Highlighted by mxs814

"The web as platform."

Highlighted by mxs814

"mashup"

Highlighted by mxs814

If Netscape was the standard bearer for Web 1.0, Google is most certainly the standard bearer for Web 2.0, if only because their respective IPOs were defining events for each era.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

Netscape framed "the web as platform" in terms of the old software paradigm: their flagship product was the web browser, a desktop application, and their strategy was to use their dominance in the browser market to establish a market for high-priced server products. Control over standards for displaying content and applications in the browser would, in theory, give Netscape the kind of market power enjoyed by Microsoft in the PC market.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

Google, by contrast, began its life as a native web application, never sold or packaged, but delivered as a service, with customers paying, directly or indirectly, for the use of that service. None of the trappings of the old software industry are present. No scheduled software releases, just continuous improvement. No licensing or sale, just usage. No porting to different platforms so that customers can run the software on their own equipment, just a massively scalable collection of commodity PCs running open source operating systems plus homegrown applications and utilities that no one outside the company ever gets to see.

Highlighted by sanilunlu

Google, by contrast, began its life as a native web application, never sold or packaged, but delivered as a service, with customers paying, directly or indirectly, for the use of that service.

Highlighted by chatfieldteacher

Google happens in the space between browser and search engine and destination content server, as an enabler or middleman between the user and his or her online experience.

Highlighted by kschwartz91

database management

Highlighted by mxs814

the value of the software is proportional to the scale and dynamism of the data it helps to manage.

Highlighted by mxs814

eBay, Amazon, Napster, and yes, DoubleClick and Akamai

Highlighted by mxs814