Eric Hanushek, an economist at Stanford, estimates that the students of a very bad teacher will learn, on average, half a year’s worth of material in one school year. The students in the class of a very good teacher will learn a year and a half’s worth of material. That difference amounts to a year’s worth of learning in a single year. Teacher effects dwarf school effects: your child is actually better off in a “bad” school with an excellent teacher than in an excellent school with a bad teacher. Teacher effects are also much stronger than class-size effects. You’d have to cut the average class almost in half to get the same boost that you’d get if you switched from an average teacher to a teacher in the eighty-fifth percentile. And remember that a good teacher costs as much as an average one, whereas halving class size would require that you build twice as many classrooms and hire twice as many teachers.
Highlighted by
sgdineen
ne of the most important tools in contemporary educational research is “value added” analysis. It uses standardized test scores to look at how much the academic performa
Highlighted by
mscotthokie
Exactly,,, this is why data we have about reading and math instruction should be used to find out who our really good teachers are. It's why I take the time to look at the data. You can't observe these people frequently enough to know, but if they work for us for a number of years, we sure can find out who is effective.
ne of the most important tools in contemporary educational research is “value added” analysis. It uses standardized test scores to look at how much the academic performa
Highlighted by
mscotthokie
Before that, he was a football coach, and before that he played linebacker—although, he says, “that was three knee operations and a hundred pounds ago.”
Highlighted by
kiberens
Actually, the more pressing problem is KEEPING the teachers, especially the good ones since they are more likely to be frustrated by the flawed system and leave to do something else.
Crude is the right word but it's all we've got. Unfortunately, this isn't usually how the testing works...teachers are judged by end of the year scores only from one year to the next so it's different groups of kids.
Unfortunately, the schools that really need the good teachers usually don't have 1000 applicants for ten positions...they're lucky if they have more than one.
And yet Harrington’s career consisted of a failed stint with the Detroit Lions and a slide into obscurity. Shonka looked back at the screen, where the young man he felt might be the best quarterback in the country was marching his team up and down the field. “How will that ability translate to the National Football League?” He shook his head slowly. “Shoot.”
Highlighted by
kiberens
This is the quarterback problem. There are certain jobs where almost nothing you can learn about candidates before they start predicts how they’ll do once they’re hired.
Highlighted by
eugenios
This is the quarterback problem. There are certain jobs where almost nothing you can learn about candidates before they start predicts how they’ll do once they’re hired. So how do we know whom to choose in cases like that? In recent years, a number of fields have begun to wrestle with this problem, but none with such profound social consequences as the profession of teaching.
Highlighted by
katieday
One of the most important tools in contemporary educational research is “value added” analysis. It uses standardized test scores to look at how much the academic performance of students in a given teacher’s classroom changes between the beginning and the end of the school year. Suppose that Mrs. Brown and Mr. Smith both teach a classroom of third graders who score at the fiftieth percentile on math and reading tests on the first day of school, in September. When the students are retested, in June, Mrs. Brown’s class scores at the seventieth percentile, while Mr. Smith’s students have fallen to the fortieth percentile. That change in the students’ rankings, value-added theory says, is a meaningful indicator of how much more effective Mrs. Brown is as a teacher than Mr. Smith.
Highlighted by
cburell
One of the most important tools in contemporary educational research is “value added” analysis. It uses standardized test scores to look at how much the academic performance of students in a given teacher’s classroom changes between the beginning and the end of the school year.
Highlighted by
katieday
on 2009-11-09 by
dendari
So instead of one test we have two big tests in a year.
It’s only a crude measure, of course. A teacher is not solely responsible for how much is learned in a classroom, and not everything of value that a teacher imparts to his or her students can be captured on a standardized test. Nonetheless, if you follow Brown and Smith for three or four years, their effect on their students’ test scores starts to become predictable: with enough data, it is possible to identify who the very good teachers are and who the very poor teachers are. What’s more—and this is the finding that has galvanized the educational world—the difference between good teachers and poor teachers turns out to be vast.
Highlighted by
witchyrichy
It’s only a crude measure, of course. A teacher is not solely responsible for how much is learned in a classroom, and not everything of value that a teacher imparts to his or her students can be captured on a standardized test. Nonetheless, if you follow Brown and Smith for three or four years, their effect on their students’ test scores starts to become predictable: with enough data, it is possible to identify who the very good teachers are and who the very poor teachers are. What’s more—and this is the finding that has galvanized the educational world—the difference between good teachers and poor teachers turns out to be vast.
Highlighted by
katieday
Eric Hanushek, an economist at Stanford, estimates that the students of a very bad teacher will learn, on average, half a year’s worth of material in one school year. The students in the class of a very good teacher will learn a year and a half’s worth of material. That difference amounts to a year’s worth of learning in a single year. Teacher effects dwarf school effects: your child is actually better off in a “bad” school with an excellent teacher than in an excellent school with a bad teacher. Teacher effects are also much stronger than class-size effects. You’d have to cut the average class almost in half to get the same boost that you’d get if you switched from an average teacher to a teacher in the eighty-fifth percentile. And remember that a good teacher costs as much as an average one, whereas halving class size would require that you build twice as many classrooms and hire twice as many teachers.
Highlighted by
cburell
Eric Hanushek, an economist at Stanford, estimates that the students of a very bad teacher will learn, on average, half a year’s worth of material in one school year. The students in the class of a very good teacher will learn a year and a half’s worth of material. That difference amounts to a year’s worth of learning in a single year.
Highlighted by
kiberens
the difference between good teachers and poor teachers turns out to be vast.
Eric Hanushek, an economist at Stanford, estimates that the students of a very bad teacher will learn, on average, half a year’s worth of material in one school year.
Highlighted by
ruffpost
almost in half to get the same boost that you’d get if you switched from an
average teacher to a teacher in the eighty-fifth percentile. And remember that a
good teacher costs as much as an average one, whereas halving class size would
require that you build twice as many classrooms and hire twice as many
teachers.
Hanushek recently
did a back-of-the-envelope calculation about what even a rudimentary focus on
teacher quality could mean for the United States. If you rank the countries of
the world in terms of the
Highlighted by
brentalan
Teacher effects dwarf school effects: your child is actually better off in a “bad” school with an excellent teacher than in an excellent school with a bad teacher.
Highlighted by
kiberens
Teacher effects dwarf school effects: your child is actually better off in a “bad” school with an excellent teacher than in an excellent school with a bad teacher. Teacher effects are also much stronger than class-size effects. You’d have to cut the average class almost in half to get the same boost that you’d get if you switched from an average teacher to a teacher in the eighty-fifth percentile.
Highlighted by
jaredstein
The students in the class of a very good teacher will learn a year and a half’s worth of material. That difference amounts to a year’s worth of learning in a single year. Teacher effects dwarf school effects: your child is actually better off in a “bad” school with an excellent teacher than in an excellent school with a bad teacher. Teacher effects are also much stronger than class-size effects.
Highlighted by
katieday
your child is actually better off in a “bad” school with an excellent teacher than in an excellent school with a bad teacher.
Highlighted by
ruffpost
Hanushek recently did a back-of-the-envelope calculation about what even a rudimentary focus on teacher quality could mean for the United States. If you rank the countries of the world in terms of the academic performance of their schoolchildren, the U.S. is just below average, half a standard deviation below a clump of relatively high-performing countries like Canada and Belgium.
Highlighted by
cburell
on 2008-12-09 by
cburell
A facile analysis, and skewed. Upper class schools are above average, while poor SES schools are below. The problem is the poor schools.
If you rank the countries of the world in terms of the academic performance of their schoolchildren
Highlighted by
ruffpost
According to Hanushek, the U.S. could close that gap simply by replacing the bottom six per cent to ten per cent of public-school teachers with teachers of average quality.
Highlighted by
cburell
on 2008-12-09 by
cburell
"Simply" is not that simple.
on 2008-12-12 by
jsb16cc
Especially when you factor in licensing and "highly qualified" requirements.
After years of worrying about issues like school funding levels, class size, and curriculum design,
Highlighted by
cburell
on 2008-12-09 by
cburell
I hope you substantiate this with data about what has been DONE about these issues, instead of the "worry." Because by many accounts, not much has been done at all.
According to Hanushek, the U.S. could close that gap simply by replacing the bottom six per cent to ten per cent of public-school teachers with teachers of average quality. After years of worrying about issues like school funding levels, class size, and curriculum design, many reformers have come to the conclusion that nothing matters more than finding people with the potential to be great teachers.
Highlighted by
bfarren
many reformers
Highlighted by
cburell
on 2008-12-09 by
cburell
Which ones? And how about the "many" who disagree with them?
After years of worrying about issues like school funding levels, class size, and curriculum design, many reformers have come to the conclusion that nothing matters more than finding people with the potential to be great teachers.
Highlighted by
jaredstein
nothing matters more than finding people with the potential to be great teachers
Highlighted by
hadleyjf
After years of worrying about issues like school funding levels, class size, and curriculum design, many reformers have come to the conclusion that nothing matters more than finding people with the potential to be great teachers. But there’s a hitch: no one knows what a person with the potential to be a great teacher looks like. The school system has a quarterback problem.
Highlighted by
katieday
As Shonka talked, Daniel was moving his team down the field. But he was almost always throwing those quick, diagonal passes. In the N.F.L., he would have to do much more than that—he would have to throw long, vertical passes over the top of the defense. Could he make that kind of throw? Shonka didn’t know. There was also the matter of his height. Six feet was fine in a spread system, where the big gaps in the offensive line gave Daniel plenty of opportunity to throw the ball and see downfield. But in the N.F.L. there wouldn’t be gaps, and the linemen rushing at him would be six-five, not six-one.
Highlighted by
kiberens
A teacher is not solely responsible for how much is learned in a classroom, and not everything of value that a teacher imparts to his or her students can be captured on a standardized test
Highlighted by
gomehead2000
although very true, sometimes the truth is the best excuse not to change... and i feel a lot of teachers use these two truths to escape the responsibility they share for their students academic performance.
A college quarterback joining the N.F.L., by contrast, has to learn to play an entirely new game.
Highlighted by
kiberens
We’re used to dealing with prediction problems by going back and looking for better predictors. We now realize that being a good doctor requires the ability to communicate, listen, and empathize—and so there is increasing pressure on medical schools to pay attention to interpersonal skills as well as to test scores. We can have better physicians if we’re just smarter about how we choose medical-school students.
Highlighted by
katieday
The problem with picking quarterbacks is that Chase Daniel’s performance can’t be predicted. The job he’s being groomed for is so particular and specialized that there is no way to know who will succeed at it and who won’t.
Highlighted by
kiberens
The problem with picking quarterbacks is that Chase Daniel’s performance can’t be predicted. The job he’s being groomed for is so particular and specialized that there is no way to know who will succeed at it and who won’t. In fact, Berri and Simmons found no connection between where a quarterback was taken in the draft—that is, how highly he was rated on the basis of his college performance—and how well he played in the pros.
Highlighted by
katieday
why shouldn’t we value someone who hasn’t had the chance to play as highly as someone who plays as well as anyone in the land?
Highlighted by
dendari
on 2009-11-09 by
dendari
Why we should have a two year mentorin gprogram. 1st year watching learning and occasionaly teaching 2nd year teaching and taking constructive criticism
Picture a young preschool teacher, sitting on a classroom floor surrounded by seven children. She is holding an alphabet book, and working through the letters with the children, one by one:
“ ‘A’ is for apple. . . . ‘C’ is for cow
.” The session was taped, and the videotape is being watched by a group of experts, who are charting and grading each of the teacher’s moves.
Highlighted by
katieday
no one knows what a person with the potential to be a great teacher looks like.
Highlighted by
gomehead2000
uhm... hello, i think this is not the root of the problem. i have seen many a great teachers with huge potential, just like the quarterbacks.
perhaps we should take a look at how these great rookies are supported once they are in a program (school or team) and how there potential is maximized.
i have seen great teachers leave because they are not supported in ways that help them unleash their potential or continue to develop it...
“regard for student perspective”; that is, a teacher’s knack for allowing students some flexibility in how they become engaged in the classroom
Highlighted by
jaredstein
Pianta’s team has developed a system for evaluating various competencies relating to student-teacher interaction. Among them is “regard for student perspective”; that is, a teacher’s knack for allowing students some flexibility in how they become engaged in the classroom.
Highlighted by
katieday
At this age, when kids show their engagement it’s not like the way we show our engagement,
Highlighted by
lindseybp
And a good teacher doesn’t interpret that as bad behavior. You can see how hard it is to teach new teachers this idea, because the minute you teach them to have regard for the student’s perspective, they think you have to give up control of the classroom.”
Highlighted by
lindseybp
At this age, when kids show their engagement it’s not like the way we show our engagement, where we look alert. They’re leaning forward and wriggling. That’s their way of doing it. And a good teacher doesn’t interpret that as bad behavior.
Highlighted by
jaredstein
Almost every time a child says something, she responds to it, which is what we describe as teacher sensitivity,” Hamre said
Highlighted by
lindseybp
The lesson continued. Pianta pointed out how the teacher managed to personalize the material. “ ‘C’ is for cow” turned into a short discussion of which of the kids had ever visited a farm. “Almost every time a child says something, she responds to it, which is what we describe as teacher sensitivity,” Hamre said.
Highlighted by
katieday
Of all the teacher elements analyzed by the Virginia group, feedback—a direct, personal response by a teacher to a specific statement by a student—seems to be most closely linked to academic success.
Highlighted by
lindseybp
feedback—a direct, personal response by a teacher to a specific statement by a student—seems to be most closely linked to academic success.
Highlighted by
ahollos
feedback—a direct, personal response by a teacher to a specific statement by a student—seems to be most closely linked to academic success
Highlighted by
jaredstein
“Mind you, that’s not
great feedback,” Hamre said. “High-quality feedback is where there is a back-and-forth exchange to get a deeper understanding.” The perfect way to handle that moment would have been for the teacher to pause and pull out Venisha’s name card, point to the letter “V,” show her how different it is from “C,” and make the class sound out both letters.
Highlighted by
lindseybp
High-quality feedback is where there is a back-and-forth exchange to get a deeper understanding.
Highlighted by
ahollos
It was a key moment. Of all the teacher elements analyzed by the Virginia group, feedback—a direct, personal response by a teacher to a specific statement by a student—seems to be most closely linked to academic success. Not only did the teacher catch the “Me!” amid the wiggling and tumult; she addressed it directly.
Highlighted by
katieday
“High-quality feedback is where there is a back-and-forth exchange to get a deeper understanding.”
Highlighted by
jaredstein
“On the other hand, she could have completely ignored the girl, which happens a lot,” Hamre went on. “The other thing that happens a lot is the teacher will just say, ‘You’re wrong.’ Yes-no feedback is probably the predominant kind of feedback, which provides almost no information for the kid in terms of learning.”
Highlighted by
lindseybp
“The other thing that happens a lot is the teacher will just say, ‘You’re wrong.’ Yes-no feedback is probably the predominant kind of feedback, which provides almost no information for the kid in terms of learning.”
Highlighted by
jaredstein
“You know, a better way to handle this would be to anchor something around the kids,” Pianta said. “She should ask, ‘What makes you feel happy?’ The kids could answer. Then she could say, ‘Show me your face when you have that feeling? O.K., what does So-and-So’s face look like? Now tell me what makes you sad. Show me your face when you’re sad. Oh, look, her face changed!’ You’ve basically made the point. And then you could have the kids practice, or something.
Highlighted by
lindseybp
Here was a teacher who read out sentences, in a spelling test, and every sentence came from her own life—“I went to a wedding last week”—which meant she was missing an opportunity to say something that engaged her students. Another teacher walked over to a computer to do a PowerPoint presentation, only to realize that she hadn’t turned it on. As she waited for it to boot up, the classroom slid into chaos.
Highlighted by
lindseybp
Then there was the superstar—a young high-school math teacher, in jeans and a green polo shirt.
Highlighted by
katieday
He was talking and moving quickly, which Pianta said might be interpreted as a bad thing, because this was trigonometry. It wasn’t easy material. But his energy seemed to infect the class. And all the time he offered the promise of help.
If you can’t, we’ll all do it.
Highlighted by
katieday
“In a group like this, the standard m.o. would be: he’s at the board, broadcasting to the kids, and has no idea who knows what he’s doing and who doesn’t know,” Pianta said. “But he’s giving individualized feedback. He’s off the charts on feedback.” Pianta and his team watched in awe.
Highlighted by
lindseybp
Educational-reform efforts typically start with a push for higher standards for teachers—that is, for the academic and cognitive requirements for entering the profession to be as stiff as possible. But after you’ve watched Pianta’s tapes, and seen how complex the elements of effective teaching are, this emphasis on book smarts suddenly seems peculiar.
Highlighted by
rahmin
Educational-reform efforts typically start with a push for higher standards for teachers—that is, for the academic and cognitive requirements for entering the profession to be as stiff as possible.
Highlighted by
lindseybp
Two and a half minutes into the lesson—the length of time it took that subpar teacher to turn on the computer—he had already laid out the problem, checked in with nearly every student in the class, and was back at the blackboard, to take the lesson a step further.
Highlighted by
katieday
“In a group like this, the standard m.o. would be: he’s at the board, broadcasting to the kids, and has no idea who knows what he’s doing and who doesn’t know,” Pianta said. “But he’s giving individualized feedback. He’s off the charts on feedback.” Pianta and his team watched in awe.
Highlighted by
jaredstein
But after you’ve watched Pianta’s tapes, and seen how complex the elements of effective teaching are, this emphasis on book smarts suddenly seems peculiar.
Highlighted by
lindseybp
“In a group like this, the standard m.o. would be: he’s at the board, broadcasting to the kids, and has no idea who knows what he’s doing and who doesn’t know,” Pianta said. “But he’s giving individualized feedback. He’s off the charts on feedback.” Pianta and his team watched in awe.
Highlighted by
katieday
after you’ve watched Pianta’s tapes, and seen how complex the elements of effective teaching are
Highlighted by
jaredstein
A group of researchers—Thomas J. Kane, an economist at Harvard’s school of
education; Douglas Staiger, an economist at Dartmouth; and Robert Gordon, a
policy analyst at the Center for American Progress—have investigated whether it
helps to have a teacher who has earned a teaching certification or a master’s
degree. Both are expensive, time-consuming credentials that almost every
district expects teachers to acquire; neither makes a difference in the
classroom. Test scores, graduate degrees, and certifications—as much as they
appear related to teaching prowess—turn out to be about as useful in predicting
success as having a quarterback throw footballs into a bunch of garbage cans.
Highlighted by
ezickel
A group of researchers—Thomas J. Kane, an economist at Harvard’s school of education; Douglas Staiger, an economist at Dartmouth; and Robert Gordon, a policy analyst at the Center for American Progress—have investigated whether it helps to have a teacher who has earned a teaching certification or a master’s degree.
Highlighted by
jaredstein
A group of researchers—Thomas J. Kane, an economist at Harvard’s school of education; Douglas Staiger, an economist at Dartmouth; and Robert Gordon, a policy analyst at the Center for American Progress—have investigated whether it helps to have a teacher who has earned a teaching certification or a master’s degree. Both are expensive, time-consuming credentials that almost every district expects teachers to acquire; neither makes a difference in the classroom.
Highlighted by
bfarren
A group of researchers—Thomas J. Kane, an economist at Harvard’s school of education; Douglas Staiger, an economist at Dartmouth; and Robert Gordon, a policy analyst at the Center for American Progress—have investigated whether it helps to have a teacher who has earned a teaching certification or a master’s degree. Both are expensive, time-consuming credentials that almost every district expects teachers to acquire; neither makes a difference in the classroom. Test scores, graduate degrees, and certifications—as much as they appear related to teaching prowess—turn out to be about as useful in predicting success as having a quarterback throw footballs into a bunch of garbage cans.
Highlighted by
katieday
But these aren’t cognitive skills.
Highlighted by
dendari
Test scores, graduate degrees, and certifications—as much as they appear related to teaching prowess—turn out to be about as useful in predicting success as having a quarterback throw footballs into a bunch of garbage cans.
Highlighted by
jsb16cc
on 2008-12-13 by
jsb16cc
And yet NCLB makes the certifications mandatory. Not that I think you can effectively teach high school content without a thorough grasp of the content and at least as thorough a grasp of basic pedagogy, but transcripts don't do a great job of measuring those...
What about certifications like CTT+ that are behavior-based? And are there any predictors for success in distance learning?
on 2009-11-09 by
dendari
It isn't that the need for a requirement is wrong, it's that the certification process itself is emphasizing the wrong things.
Another educational researcher, Jacob Kounin, once did an analysis of “desist” events, in which a teacher has to stop some kind of misbehavior.
Highlighted by
katieday
what really was significant was not how a teacher stopped the deviancy at the end of the chain but whether she was able to stop the chain before it started. Kounin called that ability “withitness,” which he defined as “a teacher’s communicating to the children by her actual behavior (rather than by verbally announcing: ‘I know what’s going on’) that she knows what the children are doing, or has the proverbial ‘eyes in the back of her head.’
Highlighted by
katieday
“regard for student perspective”; that is, a teacher’s knack for allowing students some flexibility in how they become engaged in the classroom
Highlighted by
carlaarena
In teaching, the implications are even more profound. They suggest that we shouldn’t be raising standards. We should be lowering them, because there is no point in raising standards if standards don’t track with what we care about. Teaching should be open to anyone with a pulse and a college degree—and teachers should be judged after they have started their jobs, not before. That means that the profession needs to start the equivalent of Ed Deutschlander’s training camp
Highlighted by
lindseybp
Deutschlander sees his role as keeping the gate as wide open as possible: to find ten new financial advisers, he’s willing to interview a thousand people. The equivalent of that approach, in the N.F.L., would be for a team to give up trying to figure out who the “best” college quarterback is, and, instead, try out three or four “good” candidates.
In teaching, the implications are even more profound. They suggest that we shouldn’t be raising standards. We should be lowering them, because there is no point in raising standards if standards don’t track with what we care about. Teaching should be open to anyone with a pulse and a college degree—and teachers should be judged after they have started their jobs, not before.
Highlighted by
katieday
there is no point in raising standards if standards don’t track with what we care about.
Highlighted by
jaredstein
We now realize that being a good doctor requires the ability to communicate, listen, and empathize—and so there is increasing pressure on medical schools to pay attention to interpersonal skills as well as to test scores.
Highlighted by
gomehead2000
imagine that!! qualitative indicators as well as quantitative?
instead, try out three or four “good” candidates
Highlighted by
dendari
on 2009-11-09 by
dendari
Why not spend more time in actual classrooms? instead of one sememster of student teaching which is actually only 6 to 9 weeks why not a full year or even two of working in the classroom?
In teaching, the implications are even more profound. They suggest that we shouldn’t be raising standards. We should be lowering them, because there is no point in raising standards if standards don’t track with what we care about.
Highlighted by
bfarren
Teaching should be open to anyone with a pulse and a college degree—and teachers should be judged after they have started their jobs, not before.
Highlighted by
jaredstein
Teaching should be open to anyone with a pulse and a college degree—and teachers should be judged after they have started their jobs, not before.
Highlighted by
bfarren
It needs an apprenticeship system that allows candidates to be rigorously evaluated. Kane and Staiger have calculated that, given the enormous differences between the top and the bottom of the profession, you’d probably have to try out four candidates to find one good teacher.
Highlighted by
jaredstein
It needs an apprenticeship system that allows candidates to be rigorously evaluated. Kane and Staiger have calculated that, given the enormous differences between the top and the bottom of the profession, you’d probably have to try out four candidates to find one good teacher.
Highlighted by
katieday
It needs an apprenticeship system that allows candidates to be rigorously evaluated.
Highlighted by
jsb16cc
on 2008-12-13 by
jsb16cc
YES!
An apprentice should get apprentice wages. But if we find eighty-fifth-percentile teachers who can teach a year and a half’s material in one year, we’re going to have to pay them a lot—both because we want them to stay and because the only way to get people to try out for what will suddenly be a high-risk profession is to offer those who survive the winnowing a healthy reward.
Highlighted by
katieday
But all the reformers want is for the teaching profession to copy what firms like North Star have been doing for years. Deutschlander interviews a thousand people to find ten advisers.
Highlighted by
witchyrichy
In fact, Berri and Simmons found no connection between where a quarterback was taken in the draft—that is, how highly he was rated on the basis of his college performance—and how well he played in the pros.
Highlighted by
gomehead2000
that is interesting, not sure you could not find the same correlation between bad teachers and new placements...
But all the reformers want is for the teaching profession to copy what firms like North Star have been doing for years. Deutschlander interviews a thousand people to find ten advisers.
Highlighted by
katieday
firms like North Star have been doing for years. Deutschlander interviews a thousand people to find ten advisers
Highlighted by
dendari
on 2009-11-09 by
dendari
Actually what most of these firms do is bring in thousands of applicants tell them they can make hundreds of thousands per year and then work them to death until there are just a few left. Meanwhile taking the orphaned clients and passing them off to vets who survived the trial by fire.
Having thousands of applicants actually makes them more money than being selective about who they hire.
What does it say about a society that it devotes more care and patience to the selection of those who handle its money than of those who handle its children?
Highlighted by
bfarren
What does it say about a society that it devotes more care and patience to the selection of those who handle its money than of those who handle its children?
Highlighted by
katieday
Among them is “regard for student perspective”; that is, a teacher’s knack for allowing students some flexibility in how they become engaged in the classroom. Pianta stopped and rewound the tape twice, until what the teacher had managed to achieve became plain: the children were active, but somehow the class hadn’t become a free-for-all.
Highlighted by
gomehead2000
this is something that needs to be reviewed and shown to TEP students...
desist” events, in which a teacher has to stop some kind of misbehavior. In one instance, “Mary leans toward the table to her right and whispers to Jane. Both she and Jane giggle. The teacher says, ‘Mary and Jane, stop that!’ ” That’s a desist event. But how a teacher desists—her tone of voice, her attitudes, her choice of words—appears to make no difference at all in maintaining an orderly classroom. How can that be? Kounin went back over the videotape and noticed that forty-five seconds before Mary whispered to Jane, Lucy and John had started whispering. Then Robert had noticed and joined in, making Jane giggle, whereupon Jane said something to John. Then Mary whispered to Jane. It was a contagious chain of misbehavior, and what really was significant was not how a teacher stopped the deviancy at the end of the chain but whether she was able to stop the chain before it started. Kounin called that ability “withitness,” which he defined as “a teacher’s communicating to the children by her actual behavior (rather than by verbally announcing: ‘I know what’s going on’) that she knows what the children are doing, or has the proverbial ‘eyes in the back of her head.’ ” It stands to reason that to be a great teacher you have to have withitness.
Highlighted by
gomehead2000
this is something that should have an entire course dedicated to teacher training programs.
i have watched enough kung fu movies in my time that i refuse to believe that with enough conscious and explicit training, something like "withitness" couldn't be taught...
it might look ridiculous and funny at the outset, but why couldn't new teachers get practice with the different types of class management techniques and develop more people (student) friendly skills?
on 2009-11-09 by
dendari
more time in teh classroom watching and disecting master teachers more time in teh classroom being evaluated by master teachers.
That means tenure can’t be routinely awarded, the way it is now.
Highlighted by
gomehead2000
wow... now we are going to piss some people off... i like it!!
An apprentice should get apprentice wages. But if we find eighty-fifth-percentile teachers who can teach a year and a half’s material in one year, we’re going to have to pay them a lot—both because we want them to stay and because the only way to get people to try out for what will suddenly be a high-risk profession is to offer those who survive the winnowing a healthy reward.
Highlighted by
gomehead2000
a healthy reward isn't always monetary (just ask any teacher now) the holidays help with the actual health part... but i am all for increasing teacher rewards for those deserving...
Teachers’ unions have been resistant to even the slightest move away from the current tenure arrangement.
Highlighted by
gomehead2000
this bothers me a lot... even as a union supporter.
http://www.ed4change.com/?p=81
Public Comment
on 2009-01-15 by kiberens