Are You a 'Digital Native?' | Newsweek Tech and Business | Ne...
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 31 people (-1 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-10-14
- Tdecraene on 2009-10-19 - Tags brain , research , Digital_Native
- Maximizen on 2009-07-10 - Tags brain , science , digitalnative
- Blast461 on 2009-04-09 - Tags no_tag
- Dzukor on 2009-03-20 - Tags education , technology , digital , media , science , research , brain , digitalnative
- Gulliblecynic on 2009-03-05 - Tags Brain Research , Digital Native , Technology , Science , Newsweek
Public Sticky notes
Reading This Will Change Your Brain
A leading neuroscientist says processing digital information can rewire your circuits. But is it evolution?
Highlighted by ellening
Is technology changing our brains? A new study by UCLA neuroscientist Gary Small adds to a growing body of research that says it is. And according to Small's new book, "iBRAIN: Surviving the Technological Alteration of the Modern Mind," a dramatic shift in how we gather information and communicate with one another has touched off an era of rapid evolution that may ultimately change the human brain as we know it. "Perhaps not since early man first discovered how to use a tool has the human brain been affected so quickly and so dramatically," he writes. "As the brain evolves and shifts its focus towards new technological skills, it drifts away from fundamental social skills."
The impact of technology on our circuitry should not come as a surprise. The brain's plasticity—it's ability to change in response to different stimuli—is well known. Professional musicians have more gray matter in brain regions responsible for planning finger movements. And athletes' brains are bulkier in areas that control hand-eye coordination. That's because the more time you devote to a specific activity, the stronger the neural pathways responsible for executing that activity become. So it makes sense that people who process a constant stream of digital information would have more neurons dedicated to filtering that information. Still, that's not the same thing as evolution.
Highlighted by ellening
Highlighted by jefflebow
Highlighted by blast461
on 2009-04-09 by blast461
Its not a sign of evolution, but more a ditinct reation to training the brain to quickly scan material. Much like someone who can speed read. I don't see how the capacity and usage of the capacity trigger changes at the genetic level to be passed on. This is just sillyness. What causes evolution is selective genetic traits being propogated over generations. Its a nice social psychology study, but provides no evidence to support its claims of evolution. It may prove that the brain is already powerful enough to reconfigure based on patterned usage. It is most definately not evolution.
Highlighted by adamskinner
on 2008-10-16 by adamskinner
I think it could be hyperlinks and data aggregation through search that does this. With a few keywords, similar data is clustered (and the mind understands how it is related to the keywords) and displayed on screen. Relevant bits of this data are immediate, and details are there through a hyperlink. You can traverse connected data with relative ease. Operating with data in this manner in such a short period of time allows a faux expertise to develop - relevant bits of information all at hand allow for an informed decision to be made. As the mind grows accustomed to this behaviour, it sucks information out of whatever is available and works with it as best it can. Practice makes perfect!
Highlighted by jefflebow
Highlighted by haydabeck
Highlighted by beatechie
Highlighted by beatechie
Highlighted by ellening
Highlighted by ellening
Highlighted by maximizen
Highlighted by jefflebow
Highlighted by plvitf
on 2008-10-15 by plvitf
I think that balance is huge. Too many times people are one or the other and don't want to try to mesh the two.


Public Comment
on 2008-10-15 by kreliz