Google and the end of everything » mathewingram.com/work
Popularity Report
 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rank
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 1 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-07-01
- Imrchen on 2008-07-01 - Tags google , data mining , thinking
Public Sticky notes
As I understand it, his argument is that since we have so much data, we can just use algorithms to find correlations in the data, and that will produce as much insight as years of traditional scientific research.
Highlighted by imrchen
think it has a number of serious flaws — and they are all summed up in the title, which implies that having a lot of data and some smart algorithms to sift through it means “the end of the scientific method.” That’s just ridiculous.
Highlighted by imrchen
Expanding the amount of data — even exponentially — doesn’t change the fundamental way that the scientific method functions, it just makes it a lot easier to test a hypothesis.
Highlighted by imrchen
And for the record, correlation still doesn’t mean causation, and likely won’t for the foreseeable future. Correlation just means that you found some data that shares some kind of relationship with other data; it can help suggest causation, but it doesn’t replace it.
Highlighted by imrchen
Public Comment