Marginal Revolution: The roots of medical innovation
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 1 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-02-18
- Brianddrpm on 2008-02-18 - Tags economics , healthcare , publicpolicy
Public Sticky notes
In a much-praised piece, Jon Cohn argues that the NIH, not commercial incentives, is the key to American medical innovation. He writes:
The great breakthroughs in the history of medicine, from the development of the polio vaccine to the identification of cancer-killing agents, did not take place because a for-profit company saw an opportunity and invested heavily in research. They happened because of scientists toiling in academic settings. "The nice thing about people like me in universities is that the great majority are not motivated by profit," says Cynthia Kenyon, a renowned cancer researcher at the University of California at San Francisco. "If we were, we wouldn't be here." And, while the United States may be the world leader in this sort of research, that's probably not--as critics of universal coverage frequently claim--because of our private insurance system. If anything, it's because of the federal government.
Highlighted by brianddrpm


Public Comment
on 2008-02-18 by brianddrpm