Evaluating Internet information
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 13 people (-3 private), first by anonymouse user on 2006-07-20
- Mohawklibrary on 2009-02-26 - Tags no_tag
- Mohawkdiscards on 2009-02-26 - Tags no_tag
- Nsdlworkshops on 2009-01-28 - Tags media literacy , evaluating , online resources
- Blheve on 2008-11-12 - Tags computers , information , technology
- Soulstice on 2008-11-09 - Tags no_tag
Public Sticky notes
hen you are using the World Wide Web, none of this applies. There are no filters. Because anyone can write a Web page, documents of the widest range of quality, written by authors of the widest range of authority, are available on an even playing field. Excellent resources reside along side the most dubious. The Internet epitomizes the concept of Caveat lector: Let the reader beware. This document discusses the criteria by which scholars in most fields evaluate print information, an
Highlighted by javabeanboy


Public Comment