Skip to main content

The New Crime of Thinking by Gary D. Barnett

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Bookmark History

Public Sticky notes

The New Crime of Thinking

by Gary D. Barnett

Highlighted by visigoth

It looks like the term “thought police” just might take on a whole new and real meaning.

Highlighted by visigoth

This depends on what happens in the U.S. Senate after receiving House bill H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007.

Highlighted by visigoth

This act (now S-1959 – Senate version) is now being considered by Senate committees and, if passed by the Senate and signed by the president, will become law.

Highlighted by visigoth

Common sense would indicate that something this vague and dangerous would not make it out of committee, but considering that the House passed it on October 23 with 404 ayes, 6 nays, and 22 present/not voting, I’m not holding my breath.

Highlighted by visigoth

The most disturbing aspects of this bill, and there are many, are the definitions noted in Section 899a.

Highlighted by visigoth

The three offenses defined in this document that will warrant prosecution are:

Highlighted by visigoth

“Violent Radicalization:

Highlighted by visigoth

The term ‘violent radicalization’ means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.”

Highlighted by visigoth

“Homegrown Terrorism:

Highlighted by visigoth

The term ‘homegrown terrorism’ means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”

Highlighted by visigoth

“Ideologically based violence:

Highlighted by visigoth

The term ‘ideologically based violence’ means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual’s political, religious, or social beliefs.”

Highlighted by visigoth

Besides the fact that this Act would greatly expand an already monstrous bureaucracy (Homeland Security Act of 2002), it is on its very face a threat to all ideological thinking not approved by the state.

Highlighted by visigoth

Any citizen at any given time could be considered a terrorism suspect and accused or prosecuted for “bad” thoughts.

Highlighted by visigoth

Since the very act of thinking could now be considered a crime, how would the populace react to this new paradigm?

Highlighted by visigoth

Would political debate among the citizenry become more subdued? Would watch groups, whether police or private, arise to monitor individual and group conversations? Would speaking out and writing against the government become a dangerous activity?

Highlighted by visigoth

The language contained in this proposed legislation is not only vague, it is also broad, sweeping, and unclear.

Highlighted by visigoth

The tenebrous and obscure nature of the above definitions is obviously not an accident.

Highlighted by visigoth

The broader the net, the more who are caught; the more who are caught, the more who live in fear of being caught.

Highlighted by visigoth

Ambiguity and fear are mighty deterrents, and ambiguity and fear foster obedience. In this case, unconditional obedience to the mighty state and its many dictates.

Highlighted by visigoth

In the definition of “violent radicalization,” it is a crime to adopt or promote an extremist belief system to facilitate ideologically based violence.

Highlighted by visigoth

Neither “extremist” nor type of political, religious, or social change is defined.

Highlighted by visigoth

And what about “ideologically” based violence? Is it violence to simply advocate radical change that might lead someone else to initiate violence?

Highlighted by visigoth

Who decides what beliefs are okay and what beliefs are not?

Highlighted by visigoth

The state, of course, is the final decider. The door is left open for interpretation, but for interpretation by government only.

Highlighted by visigoth

“Homegrown terrorism,” although similarly defined, is notable in that it concentrates strictly on U.S.-born, U.S.-raised, or U.S.-based individuals and groups operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States.

Highlighted by visigoth

The Bush administration has had its problems in the courts at times concerning American citizens and their rights, sometimes setting it and its agenda back. This bill could help alleviate those problems.

Highlighted by visigoth

In addition, to intimidate or coerce the U.S. government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives, is forbidden and considered criminal.

Highlighted by visigoth

Let me repeat; to intimidate the government to further political or social objectives is forbidden.

Highlighted by visigoth

If this is allowed to stand, what does it do to demonstration, protest, petition, and the right to assemble?

Highlighted by visigoth

Remember, this proposed act is attached to the Homeland Security Act of 2002.

Highlighted by visigoth

This is what gives it the teeth so that the enforcers can pursue and detain those considered guilty of holding or promoting an “extremist” belief system or wishing to advance political, religious, or social change.

Highlighted by visigoth

I use the word “enforcers” because this bill allows for the federal authorities, including intelligence and law enforcement, to use any state or local law-enforcement agencies.

Highlighted by visigoth

In addition, the commission may contract to enable enforcement.

Highlighted by visigoth

Also, “The Commission may request directly from any executive department, bureau, agency, board, commission, office, independent establishment, or instrumentality of the Government, information, suggestions, estimates, and statistics for the purposes of this Section.” (Section 899C.)

Highlighted by visigoth

What little privacy still exists will not exist for long with the passage of this bill.

Highlighted by visigoth

One of the tenets of any totalitarian society is that the citizenry must acquiesce to government control.

Highlighted by visigoth

The state itself is supreme and sovereign, not the people. This has been true throughout history whether it was during Hitler’s, Stalin’s, Mao’s or any other of a number of brutal dictatorial rulers’ reigns.

Highlighted by visigoth

Dissent was stifled, whether it was ideological or physical, and accused parties faced humiliation, incarceration, or death for their unwillingness to conform. Is that where we’re headed?

Highlighted by visigoth

The newest weapon we have at our disposal in our fight against tyranny is our advanced communication systems, especially the Internet.

Highlighted by visigoth

Reaching untold numbers of persons, something not possible only a few years ago, is now possible because of the Internet.

Highlighted by visigoth

With the mainstream media kowtowing to politicians and government, the Internet has become the major tool for those promoting liberty and truth.

Highlighted by visigoth

It has allowed many brilliant freedom lovers to reach and change minds. Even this has not escaped the watchful eye of Big Brother in this bill.

Highlighted by visigoth

In Section 899B Congress finds the following:

Highlighted by visigoth

“The internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens.”

Highlighted by visigoth

This bill, if passed into law, will do nothing less than muffle, if not destroy, our ability to speak out against government.

Highlighted by visigoth

Considering the combination of the USA PATRIOT Act, The Homeland Security Act, the Military Commissions Act, and the now-enhanced executive power, adding this single piece of legislation fills the only loophole left.

Highlighted by visigoth

With the passage of this abominable act, all U.S. citizens are at risk, not just those few radical persons and foreigners spoken about by government, but all of us.

Highlighted by visigoth

This very article could be considered as ideologically based violence, subjecting me to punishment by government. This could be the final piece of the puzzle.

Highlighted by visigoth

This new proposed legislation will help an already tyrannical government in its effort to become supreme.

February 2, 2008

Highlighted by visigoth

Readers (0)