Skip to main content

The Law of Accelerating Returns

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Groups (1)

Bookmark History

Saved by 45 people (12 private), first by anonymouse user on 2006-03-02


Public Comment

on 2006-07-27 by imouthesmp

The Law of Accelerating Returns by Ray Kurzweil

on 2006-09-21 by akozoom

Kurzweil says: "Although technology grows in the exponential domain, we humans live in a linear world." and explains why singumarity is next to us: see: http://www.singinst.org/links.html (the singularity site to know what's form of ai it is)...it is about exponential against linear, and so that science give us new form of life as we are still in linear minded.

on 2006-10-26 by philna

Ray Kurzweil's 2001 essay on the singularity

on 2006-12-30 by iconolith

An analysis of the history of technology shows that technological change is exponential, contrary to the common-sense "intuitive linear" view. So we won't experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century -- it will be more like 20,000 years of progres

Public Sticky notes

Reverse Engineering the Human Brain

Highlighted by akozoom

Highlighted by akozoom

hat by 2099, the intelligence that will have emerged from human-machine civilization will be trillions of trillions of times more powerful than it is today, dominated of course by its nonbiological form.

Highlighted by akozoom

Once the nonbiological intelligence emerging from that species' technology has saturated its vicinity (and the nature of this saturation is another complex issue, which I won't deal with in this essay), it has no other way to continue to evolve but to expand outwardly.

Highlighted by akozoom

t is important to ponder the nature of exponential growth. Toward this end, I am fond of telling the tale of the inventor of chess and his patron, the emperor of China. In response to the emperor's offer of a reward for his new beloved game, the inventor asked for a single grain of rice on the first square, two on the second square, four on the third, and so on. The Emperor quickly granted this seemingly benign and humble request. One version of the story has the emperor going bankrupt as the 63 doublings ultimately totaled 18 million trillion grains of rice. At ten grains of rice per square inch, this requires rice fields covering twice the surface area of the Earth, oceans included. Another version of the story has the inventor losing his head.

It should be pointed out that as the emperor and the inventor went through the first half of the chess board, things were fairly uneventful. The inventor was given spoonfuls of rice, then bowls of rice, then barrels. By the end of the first half of the chess board, the inventor had accumulated one large field's worth (4 billion grains), and the emperor did start to take notice. It was as they progressed through the second half of the chessboard that the situation quickly deteriorated. Incidentally, with regard to the doublings of computation, that's about where we stand now--there have been slightly more than 32 doublings of performance since the first programmable computers were invented during World War II.

This is the nature of exponential growth. Although technology grows in the exponential domain, we humans live in a linear world. So technological trends are not noticed as small levels of technological power are doubled. Then seemingly out of nowhere, a technology explodes into view. For example, when the Internet went from 20,000 to 80,000 nodes over a two year period during the 1980s, this progress remained hidden from the general public. A decade later, when it went from 20 million to 80 million nodes in the same amount of time, the impact was rather conspicuous.

As exponential growth continues to accelerate into the first half of the twenty-first century, it will appear to explode into infinity, at least from the limited and linear perspective of contemporary humans. The progress will ultimately become so fast that it will rupture our ability to follow it. It will literally get out of our control. The illusion that we have our hand "on the plug," will be dispelled.

Highlighted by michelemmartin

The Law of Accelerating Returns
by   Ray Kurzweil

Highlighted by amelchi

Can the pace of technological progress continue to speed up indefinitely? Is there not a point where humans are unable to think fast enough to keep up with it? With regard to unenhanced humans, clearly so. But what would a thousand scientists, each a thousand times more intelligent than human scientists today, and each operating a thousand times faster than contemporary humans (because the information processing in their primarily nonbiological brains is faster) accomplish? One year would be like a millennium. What would they come up with?

Highlighted by mwesch

Well, for one thing, they would come up with technology to become even more intelligent (because their intelligence is no longer of fixed capacity).

Highlighted by mwesch

This, then, is the Singularity. The Singularity is technological change so rapid and so profound that it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history.

Highlighted by mwesch

Needless to say, the Singularity will transform all aspects of our lives, social, sexual, and economic,

Highlighted by mwesch

Some prominent dates from this analysis include the following:

  • We achieve one Human Brain capability (2 * 10^16 cps) for $1,000 around the year 2023.
  • We achieve one Human Brain capability (2 * 10^16 cps) for one cent around the year 2037.
  • We achieve one Human Race capability (2 * 10^26 cps) for $1,000 around the year 2049.
  • We achieve one Human Race capability (2 * 10^26 cps) for one cent around the year 2059.

Highlighted by mwesch

Downloading the Human Brain

Highlighted by mwesch

A Thought Experiment

Highlighted by mwesch

By 2030, going to a web site will mean entering a full immersion virtual reality environment.

Highlighted by mwesch

Brain implants based on massively distributed intelligent nanobots will ultimately expand our memories a trillion fold, and otherwise vastly improve all of our sensory, pattern recognition, and cognitive abilities.

Highlighted by mwesch

And in the same way that biological self-replication gone awry (i.e., cancer) results in biological destruction, a defect in the mechanism curtailing nanobot self-replication would endanger all physical entities, biological or otherwise.

Highlighted by mwesch

A related question is "is death desirable?"

Highlighted by mwesch

Plan to Stick Around

Highlighted by mwesch