News: The Evidence on Online Education - Inside Higher Ed
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 48 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2009-06-29
- Soctechnologist on 2009-10-23 - Tags education , research , elearning , online learning , study
- Bibliologue on 2009-10-22 - Tags education , elearning
- Vale24 on 2009-09-03 - Tags education , research , online learning , elearning , learning , study , evidence , e-learning
- Philashman on 2009-08-24 - Tags elearning , online learning , research
- Johoedu on 2009-08-10 - Tags online learning , nätbaserade kurser , education
Public Sticky notes
WASHINGTON -- Online learning has definite advantages over face-to-face instruction when it comes to teaching and learning, according to a new meta-analysis released Friday by the U.S. Department of Education.
The study found that students who took all or part of their instruction online performed better, on average, than those taking the same course through face-to-face instruction. Further, those who took "blended" courses -- those that combine elements of online learning and face-to-face instruction -- appeared to do best of all. That finding could be significant as many colleges report that blended instruction is among the fastest-growing types of enrollment.
Highlighted by wiredinstructor
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by brinstitute
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by learningcoach
Highlighted by leannech
Highlighted by brinstitute
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by learningcoach
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by wiredinstructor
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by wiredinstructor
Highlighted by whmj22work
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by learningcoach
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by discosam
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by leannech
Highlighted by terontech
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by learningcoach
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by wiredinstructor
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by terontech
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by whmj22work
n noting caveats about the findings, the study returns to the issue of time.
"Despite what appears to be strong support for online learning applications, the studies in this meta-analysis do not demonstrate that online learning is superior as a medium," the report says. "In many of the studies showing an advantage for online learning, the online and classroom conditions differed in terms of time spent, curriculum and pedagogy. It was the combination of elements in the treatment conditions (which was likely to have included additional learning time and materials as well as additional opportunities for collaboration) that produced the observed learning advantages. At the same time, one should note that online learning is much more conducive to the expansion of learning time than is face-to-face instruction."
Highlighted by wiredinstructor
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by terontech
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by leannech
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by brinstitute
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by wiredinstructor
Highlighted by howardcdn53
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by hugodomingos
Highlighted by learningcoach
Highlighted by discosam
Highlighted by wiredinstructor
Highlighted by howardcdn53
I've taken several distance and blended courses at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. Some have been excellent learning experiences, and others have been absolutely agonizing, exhausting, and virtually unfinishable.
SL is correct in that this type of course is better adapted to the undergrad or applied level than, say, a graduate course in humanities. What makes the difference is the instructor's ability to accurately plan the time in the online environment.
Most of these courses-- even the blended ones-- feature compulsory online discussions among small groups of students, which I invariably found time-consuming and worthless as a learning method. Everyone is just putting in their blah-blah-blah in order to get the participation mark.
Yes, it's convenient for the instructor to park all the course materials on the online site-- but it is damned inconvenient and time-consuming for the students to have to download and read online or print documents that are literally hundreds of pages long.
These courses are also often overplanned, with learners forced down the tunnel of the instructor's objectives without much flexibility or consideration for the needs of the actual (not hypothetical) learners, and without any opportunity for sidetracks or serenipitous learning. For students with a more discursive learning style, this can be extremely frustrating.
I am concerned that too many decision-makers will take this study as the latest whiz-bang, ain't distance ed great proof without looking more deeply at the caveats. I would still take a well-taught F2F course over a distance or blended course any time
Highlighted by learningcoach
Highlighted by learningcoach
Highlighted by learningcoach
Highlighted by learningcoach


Public Comment