Skip to main content

GNI Concerned About Lack of Transparency and Accountability i...

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Bookmark History

Saved by 2 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2009-03-26


Public Sticky notes

Around the globe, government authorities often use legal or technical means to censor information and communications online. The recent blocking of YouTube in China was done without notice to the public or any explanation of the legal basis for the action. Such actions are inconsistent with the rule of law and the right to freedom of expression.

Highlighted by isaacmao

The Chinese government’s statements to date have not provided an explanation of whether YouTube is officially blocked, and if so what content may have violated the law, or on whose authority the blocking was imposed.

Highlighted by isaacmao

Many blocking remedies appear to be broader than necessary to further local law and policy goals.  Such overbroad actions inhibit the exercise of basic human rights to freedom of expression and access to information.  Blocking not only impacts the right of people in that country to speak and access information, but also the right of the world to speak to people in the country imposing the block.   

Highlighted by isaacmao