Why Germans Supported Hitler, Part 2
Popularity Report
 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rank
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 2 people (1 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-09-24
- Visigoth on 2008-01-14 - Tags civil-liberties , george-bush , germans , germany , government , hitler , nazis , neocons , part-2 , peoples-court , scholl , terrorism , tyranny , usa , war
- Aeschylus on 2007-09-24 - Tags activism , essays
Public Sticky notes
Why Germans Supported Hitler, Part 2
by Jacob G. Hornberger, Posted July 18, 2007
by Jacob G. Hornberger, Posted July 18, 2007
Highlighted by visigoth
The most remarkable part of the movie Sophie Scholl: The Final Days is the courtroom scene, which is based on recently discovered German archives.
Highlighted by visigoth
Sophie and her brother Hans, along with their friend Christoph Probst, stand before the infamous Roland Freisler, presiding judge of the People’s Court, whom Hitler had immediately sent to Munich after the Gestapo’s arrest of the Scholls and Probst.
Highlighted by visigoth
The People’s Court had been established by Hitler as part of the government’s war on terrorism after the terrorist firebombing of the German parliament building.
Highlighted by visigoth
Displeased with the independence of the judiciary in the trials of the suspected Reichstag terrorists, Hitler had set up the People’s Court to ensure that terrorists
and traitors would receive the “proper” verdict and punishment.
Highlighted by visigoth
Judicial proceedings were conducted in secret for reasons of national security, which is why Freisler threw Hans’s and Sophie’s parents out of the courtroom when they tried to enter.
Highlighted by visigoth
At the trial, Freisler railed at the three young people before him, accusing them of being ungrateful traitors for having opposed their government in the midst of the war. His rant went to the core of why many Germans supported Hitler during World War II.
Highlighted by visigoth
From the first grade in public (i.e., government) schools, it was ingrained in German children that, during times of war, it was the duty of every German to come to the support of his country, which, in the minds of the German officials, was synonymous with the German government.
Highlighted by visigoth
Once a war was under way, the time for discussion and debate was over, at least until the war was over.
Highlighted by visigoth
Opposition to the war would demoralize the troops, it was said, and, therefore, hurt the war effort. Opposing the government (and the troops) in wartime, therefore, was considered treasonous.
Highlighted by visigoth
Keep in mind that at the time the Scholls were caught distributing their anti-war and anti-government leaflets — 1943 — Germany was fighting a war for its survival on two fronts: the Eastern front against the Soviet Union and the Western front against Britain and the United States.
Highlighted by visigoth
Thousands of German soldiers were dying on the battlefield, especially in the Soviet Union. Whether they agreed with the war effort or not, the German people were expected to support the troops, which meant supporting the war effort.
Highlighted by visigoth
Lies and wars of aggression
Highlighted by visigoth
One might object that, since Germany was the aggressor in the conflict, the German people should have refused to support the war.
Highlighted by visigoth
That objection, however, ignores an important point: that in the minds of many Germans, Germany was not the aggressor in World War II but rather the defending nation. After all, that’s what they had been told by their government officials.
Highlighted by visigoth
An aggressor nation will inevitably try to manipulate events so as to appear to be the victimized nation — that is, the nation that is defending itself against aggression.
Highlighted by visigoth
In that way, government officials can tell the citizenry, “We are innocent! We were just minding our own business when our nation was attacked.”
Highlighted by visigoth
Naturally, the citizenry can then assume that there was nothing that could have been done to prevent the war and will be more willing to defend their nation against the attackers.
Highlighted by visigoth
That is exactly what happened in Germany’s invasion of Poland, which precipitated World War II.
Highlighted by visigoth
Hitler followed the time-honored script by dramatically announcing that Germany had been attacked by Poland, requiring Germany to defend herself with a counterattack and an invasion of Poland.
Highlighted by visigoth
There was one big problem, however — one that the German people were unaware of: the Polish troops who had done the attacking were actually German troops dressed up in Polish uniforms.
Highlighted by visigoth
In other words, German officials had lied about the cause of the war.
Highlighted by visigoth
Now, some might argue that Germans should not have automatically believed Hitler, especially knowing that throughout history rulers had lied about matters relating to war.
Highlighted by visigoth
But Germans took the position that they had the right and the duty to place their trust in their government officials. After all, Germans felt, their government officials had access to information that the people did not have.
Highlighted by visigoth
Many Germans felt that their government would never lie to them about a matter as important as war.
Highlighted by visigoth
Also, keep in mind that under the Nazi system Hitler had the sole prerogative of deciding whether to send the nation into war. While he might consult with the Reichstag or advise it of his plans, he did not need its consent to declare and wage war against another nation.
Highlighted by visigoth
He — and he alone — had the power to decide whether to go to war.
Highlighted by visigoth
Therefore, given that Hitler was not required to secure a declaration of war from the Reichstag before going to war against Poland, there was no real way to test whether his claims of a Polish attack were in fact true.
Highlighted by visigoth
After the German “counterattack” against Poland, England and France declared war on Germany. (Oddly, neither country declared war on the Soviet Union, which also invaded Poland soon after Germany did.)
Highlighted by visigoth
Thus, in the minds of the German people, England and France were coming to the aid of the aggressor — Poland — necessitating Germany’s defending itself against all three nations.
Highlighted by visigoth
Loyalty and obeying orders
Highlighted by visigoth
German soldiers, of course, were also expected to do their duty and follow the orders of their commander in chief.
Highlighted by visigoth
Under Germany’s system, it was not up to the individual soldier to reach his own independent judgment about whether Germany was the aggressor in the conflict or whether Hitler had lied about the reasons for going to war.
Highlighted by visigoth
Thus, German soldiers, both Protestant and Catholic, understood that they could kill Polish soldiers with a clear conscience because, again, it was not up to the individual soldier to decide on the justice of the war.
Highlighted by visigoth
He could entrust that decision to his superior officers and political leaders and simply assume that the order to invade was morally and legally justified.
Highlighted by visigoth
Once troops were committed to battle, most German civilians understood their duty — support the troops who were now fighting and dying on the battlefield for their country, for the fatherland. The time for debating and discussing the causes of the war would have to wait until the war’s end. What mattered, once the war was under way, was winning.
Highlighted by visigoth
Hermann Goering, founder of the Gestapo, explained the strategy:
Highlighted by visigoth
Why, of course, the people don’t want war.... Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship....
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.
Highlighted by visigoth
Recognizing and opposing evil
Highlighted by visigoth
Some might argue that Germans, unlike people in other nations, should not have trusted and supported their government officials during the war because it was obvious that Hitler and his henchmen were evil.
Highlighted by visigoth
The problem with that argument, however, is that throughout the 1930s many Germans and many foreigners did not automatically come to the conclusion that Hitler was evil.
Highlighted by visigoth
On the contrary, as we saw in part one of this article, many of them saw Hitler as exercising the same kind of strong leadership that Franklin Roosevelt was exercising to bring the United States out of the Great Depression and, in fact, as implementing many of the same kinds of programs that Roosevelt was implementing in the United States.
Highlighted by visigoth
Moreover, while it’s true that throughout the 1930s Hitler was harassing, abusing, and mistreating German Jews, many people all over the world didn’t care, because anti-Semitism was not limited to Germany but instead extended to many parts of the globe.
Highlighted by visigoth
Even after the outbreak of the war, when the severity of the Nazi threat to Jews skyrocketed, the constantly shifting maze of U.S. immigration rules and regulations prevented Anne Frank and her family, along with lots of other Jewish families, from immigrating to the United States.
Highlighted by visigoth
Some might say that the German people should have ceased supporting their government once the Holocaust began.
Highlighted by visigoth
There are two big problems with that argument, however. First, the German people didn’t know what was going on in the death camps and, second, they didn’t want to know.
Highlighted by visigoth
After all, the death camps and the Holocaust didn’t get established until after the war was well under way and when Hitler’s power over the German people was absolute — and brutal.
Highlighted by visigoth
How was the average German supposed to know about what was going on inside the death camps?
Highlighted by visigoth
After all, what government is going to permit its citizens to know its most secret operations, especially during times of war? Not even the U.S. government does that.
Highlighted by visigoth
For example, what do you think would happen if an American citizen today discovered the location of one of the CIA’s secret overseas detention facilities and then knocked on the front door, saying, “I’ve heard rumors that you are torturing people here. I would like to come in and inspect the premises to see whether those rumors are true.”
Highlighted by visigoth
Does anyone honestly think that the CIA would let the person inside those supersecret facilities?
Highlighted by visigoth
Now, imagine a situation in which the United States is fighting a major war for its survival against, say, China on one side, and an alliance of Middle East countries on the other. Suppose also that the United States is almost certain to lose the war and that foreign troops are slowly but surely closing in on the U.S. president and his cabinet. What are the chances that the CIA would permit an American citizen to inspect the insides of its prisoner facilities under those circumstances? Indeed, what are the chances that any American is going to make such a demand under those circumstances?
Highlighted by visigoth
Most Germans did not want to know what was going on inside the concentration camps. If they knew that bad things were occurring, their consciences might start bothering them, which might motivate them to take action to bring the wrongdoing to a stop, which could be dangerous.
Highlighted by visigoth
It was easier — and safer — to look the other way and simply entrust such important matters to their government officials.
Highlighted by visigoth
In that way, it was believed, the government, rather than the individual citizen, would bear the legal and moral consequences for wrongful acts that the government was committing secretly.
Highlighted by visigoth
Of course, government officials encouraged that mindset of conscious indifference.
Highlighted by visigoth
Don’t concern yourselves with such things, they suggested; just leave them to us — after all, we are at war and these are things that are best left to your government officials.
Highlighted by visigoth
No doubt that by the time World War II was well under way some Germans were thinking that the time for protesting had been during the 1930s, when Germans were reaching out for a “strong leader” to get them out of “crises” and “emergencies,” and when protests against the government were much less dangerous.
Highlighted by visigoth
Patriotism and courage
Highlighted by visigoth
All this, obviously, places Hans and Sophie Scholl and the other members of the White Rose in a remarkable light, one that even many Americans might find discomforting.
Highlighted by visigoth
After all, it’s easy for an American to look at Nazi Germany from the perspective of an outsider and one who has the benefit of historical knowledge, especially about the Holocaust. The interesting question, however, is, What would Americans have done if they had been German citizens during World War II?
Highlighted by visigoth
Would they have opposed their government, as the members of the White Rose did, or would they have supported their government, especially knowing that the troops were fighting and dying on the battlefield?
Highlighted by visigoth
In one of their leaflets, the members of the White Rose wrote, “We are your bad conscience.”
Highlighted by visigoth
They were asking Germans to rise above the old, degenerate concept of patriotism that entailed blindly supporting one’s government in time of war. They were asking German soldiers to rise above the old, degenerate concept of blind obedience to orders. They were asking Germans to confront openly the rumors of what German officials were doing to the Jews in the concentration camps. They were asking German citizens, both civilian and military, to make an independent judgment on both the Hitler regime and the war, to judge both the government and the war as immoral and illegitimate, and to take the necessary steps to put a stop to both.
Highlighted by visigoth
They were asking Germans to embrace a different and higher concept of patriotism — one that involves a devotion to a set of moral principles and values rather than blind allegiance to one’s government in time of war.
Highlighted by visigoth
It was a type of patriotism that involved opposition to one’s own government, especially in time of war, when government is engaged in conduct that violates moral principles and values.
Highlighted by visigoth
The story of the White Rose is one of the most remarkable stories of courage in history.
Highlighted by visigoth
At the trial, Christoph Probst asked Freisler to spare his life, an understandable request given that his wife had recently given birth to their third child. Neither Sophie nor her brother Hans flinched.
Highlighted by visigoth
Sophie bluntly told Friesler that the war was lost and that German soldiers were being sacrificed for nothing, a statement that, from the looks on the faces of the military brass attending the trial in the film, momentarily hit home.
Highlighted by visigoth
She said that one day Freisler and his ilk would be sitting in the dock being judged by others for their crimes. She bluntly told him, “Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don’t dare express themselves as we did.”
Highlighted by visigoth
Freisler quickly issued the preordained verdict — Guilty — and sentenced the defendants to death, a sentence that was carried out at the guillotine three days after they had been arrested.
Highlighted by visigoth
After all, as Freisler declared, Hans and Sophie Scholl and their friend Christoph Probst had opposed their government during time of war. In Freisler’s mind — indeed, in the minds of many Germans — what better evidence of treason than that?
Highlighted by visigoth
Public Comment