Skip to main content

Moving Toward Web 2.0 in K-12 Education | Britannica Blog

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Bookmark History

Saved by 38 people (-2 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-10-22


Public Sticky notes

My personal definition of Web 2.0 is not complicated. With an appropriate nod to Tim O’Reilly, who used the phrase originally in a business context, I’d like to suggest that for the sake of our discussions around education that Web 2.0 is simply the use of the Internet as a two-way medium- - -that it is a platform upon which content is not only consumed but also created. For my generation, our use of the Web largely mirrored our experiences with print and broadcast media: we were the audience, and a select few were the creators (this would be Web 1.0, if you will). For my children and our students today, their use of the Web often entirely revolves around content that they and their friends have created, and within Web frameworks or scaffolding that facilitate that creativity rather than providing the content for them. They build profile pages, upload photos and videos, and interact with each other and that content through active commenting systems.

Highlighted by beatrix

education that Web 2.0 is simply the use of the Internet as a two-way medium- - -that it is a platform upon which content is not only consumed but also created. For my generation, our use of the Web largely mirrored our experiences with print and broadcast media: we were the audience, and a select few were the creators (this would be Web 1.0, if you will). For my children and our students today, their use of the Web often entirely revolves around content that they and their friends have created, and within Web frameworks or scaffolding that facilitate that creativity rather than providing the content for them. They build profile pages, upload photos and videos, and interact with each other and that content through active commenting systems.

Highlighted by junebre

My personal definition of Web 2.0 is not complicated. With an appropriate nod to Tim O’Reilly, who used the phrase originally in a business context, I’d like to suggest that for the sake of our discussions around education that Web 2.0 is simply the use of the Internet as a two-way medium- - -that it is a platform upon which content is not only consumed but also created. For my generation, our use of the Web largely mirrored our experiences with print and broadcast media: we were the audience, and a select few were the creators (this would be Web 1.0, if you will). For my children and our students today, their use of the Web often entirely revolves around content that they and their friends have created, and within Web frameworks or scaffolding that facilitate that creativity rather than providing the content for them. They build profile pages, upload photos and videos, and interact with each other and that content through active commenting systems.

Web 2.0, defined this way, is facilitating a dramatic change in our relationship to information. The advent of printing press lowered the cost of producing written material, and Web 2.0 not only brings that cost now to essentially zero (anyone in this country can go to a public library and use a computer for free and with free software publish to the web), it is also bringing the nature of information publication as a conversation to the user who used to just be a part of “the audience.” While most of us watched those conversations taking place between trusted authorities or authors before in a world of broadcast media, we are often now immersed in them ourselves.

Highlighted by dscetc

’d like to suggest that for the sake of our discussions around education that Web 2.0 is simply the use of the Internet as a two-way medium- - -that it is a platform upon which content is not only consumed but also created. For my generation, our use of the Web largely mirrored our experiences with print and broadcast media: we were the audience, and a select few were the creators (this would be Web 1.0, if you will).

Highlighted by mjdaniel

For my children and our students today, their use of the Web often entirely revolves around content that they and their friends have created, and within Web frameworks or scaffolding that facilitate that creativity rather than providing the content for them. They build profile pages, upload photos and videos, and interact with each other and that content through active commenting systems.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

change in our relationship to information.

Highlighted by ajeschke

The advent of printing press lowered the cost of producing written material, and Web 2.0 not only brings that cost now to essentially zero (anyone in this country can go to a public library and use a computer for free and with free software publish to the web), it is also bringing the nature of information publication as a conversation to the user who used to just be a part of “the audience.”

Highlighted by mjdaniel

2.0 not only brings that cost now to essentially zero

Highlighted by ajeschke

While most of us watched those conversations taking place between trusted authorities or authors before in a world of broadcast media, we are often now immersed in them ourselves.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

What is abundantly clear is that no matter what our schools are currently doing, most of our students are already actively involved in this content creation and conversation outside of school. In a series of reports recently released by BECTA (the government agency leading the UK drive to ensure the effective and innovative use of technology throughout learning) on Web 2.0 technologies for learning, students ages 11 - 16 were surveyed. 74% reported that they had at least one social networking site account and 78% reported having uploaded pictures, video, or music to the web–with 50% having done so in the previous week of being asked. If we make the somewhat logical assumption that most parents are still living in a Web 1.0 world (largely passive consumers of content created by others) , then whether we see the Web as a dangerous collection of minefields or as an unparalleled learning environment, most youth are participating on the Web without the benefit of much guidance or mentoring from the adults who are most interested in their progress and well-being.

Highlighted by beatrix

The Web as a Conversation

Highlighted by ogduartev

Web as a conversation

Highlighted by ajeschke

becomes an educational imperative to teach ourselves and students to be productive participants in those conversations

Highlighted by ajeschke

nswer to information overload is to create (

Highlighted by ajeschke

teach the creation of

Highlighted by ajeschke

most of our students are already actively involved in this content creation and conversation outside of school.

Highlighted by ajeschke

eb 2.0 technologies for learning, students ages 11 - 16 were surveyed. 74% reported that they had at least one social networking site account and 78% reported having uploaded pictures, video, or music to the web–with 50% having done so in the previous week of being asked

Highlighted by mjdaniel

most youth are participating on the Web without the benefit of much guidance or mentoring from the adults who are most interested in their progress and well-being.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

So, if for no other reasons than we might muster to justify driver’s education in schools (learning to do something very important that carries some inherent and significant personal and social dangers), we can argue for the need to be teaching Web 2.0 as a part of K-12 education

Highlighted by mjdaniel

dramatically rethink our educational institutions and expectations

Highlighted by ajeschke

Web 2.0 instead seems likely to change education precisely because it is a disruptive external change.

Highlighted by ajeschke

then whether we see the Web as a dangerous collection of minefields or as an unparalleled learning environment, most youth are participating on the Web without the benefit of much guidance or mentoring from the adults who are most interested in their progress and well-being.

Highlighted by sgallagher4

Engagement.

Highlighted by ajeschke

engagement of Web 2.0 is in the act of content creation

Highlighted by mjdaniel

engage students because of the authentic nature of the work rather than being required assignments.

Highlighted by ajeschke

Authenticity

Highlighted by mjdaniel

Students today are creating on the Web for very real audiences, and their writing or production has to pass a very real test:

Highlighted by mjdaniel

real test: are they

Highlighted by ajeschke

very real audiences

Highlighted by ajeschke

communicating well?

Highlighted by ajeschke

contributor to world’s body of knowledge.

Highlighted by ajeschke

actually being a contributor to world’s body of knowledge

Highlighted by mjdaniel

Participation

Highlighted by mjdaniel

Hundreds of millions of dollars, if not more, have been spent on outfitting schools with computers, and most of us would appropriately claim that the impact on student achievement has been little to none.

Highlighted by sgallagher4

can find specific intellectual paths to tread where they are able to participate,

Highlighted by ajeschke

relatively divorced from teaching methodologies, and either not in a quantity or in a condition to allow overworked teachers to change their teaching methods. Driven not by technology vendors or unproven theories, Web 2.0 instead seems likely to change education precisely because it is a disruptive external change.

Highlighted by sgallagher4

backbone

Highlighted by ajeschke

openness.

Highlighted by ajeschke

making obsolete many of the restrictions on access to

Highlighted by ajeschke

Openness and Access to Information.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

information

Highlighted by ajeschke

Web 2.0 is making obsolete many of the restrictions on access to information that were intended to protect the rights of creators, but instead mostly inhibited learning by others

Highlighted by mjdaniel

world’s knowledge doubles in short periods of time, the incentives or rewards for keeping information proprietary

Highlighted by ajeschke

significantly diminish,

Highlighted by ajeschke

Collaboration.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

collaboration is

Highlighted by ajeschke

given real practical value to a character trait

Highlighted by ajeschke

not only king, but it can be seen and assessed–look at the history page of a wiki,

Highlighted by ajeschke

linked list of

Highlighted by ajeschke

unparalleled ability to build or participate in personal learning networks and communities of interest or practice.

Highlighted by ajeschke

in the midst of the greatest increase of creative capability in the

Highlighted by ajeschke

istory of the world.

Highlighted by ajeschke

Creativity

Highlighted by mjdaniel

write, film, and edit a video which then can be uploaded to YouTube

Highlighted by mjdaniel

online portfolio of the endeavors they are passionate about. Where the resume and the degrees have been our short-cut indicators of abilities and accomplishments, the personal body of work now contained and hopefully organized on the Web gives everyone who wants it the the opportunity for an expression of personal interest and achievement.

Highlighted by ajeschke

Passionate Interest and Personal Expression

Highlighted by mjdaniel

online portfolio

Highlighted by mjdaniel

great features of

Highlighted by ajeschke

thoughtful discussion.

Highlighted by ajeschke

discussion forum, which provides an environment for learning how to actually talk about things.

Highlighted by ajeschke

Discussion

Highlighted by mjdaniel

provides an environment for learning how to actually talk about things

Highlighted by mjdaniel

often becomes much more thoughtful in the context of a discussion forum.

Highlighted by ajeschke

contribute to discussions after class

Highlighted by ajeschke

broader opportunity for participation

Highlighted by ajeschke

Asynchronous Contribution

Highlighted by mjdaniel

contribute to discussions after class, or from home, provides a much broader opportunity for participation that the traditional class discussion. Students with different contribution styles, or who process information over time, are now more participative.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

rewards the proactive learner and contributor.

Highlighted by ajeschke

Proactivity.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

needs students who have learned to participate actively and independently.

Highlighted by ajeschke

ut the world has changed, and employers want and the world needs students who have learned to participate actively and independently

Highlighted by mjdaniel

“spirited” child

Highlighted by ajeschke

much more likely to be able to work on things she likes and is good at because of her willingness to be proactive.

Highlighted by ajeschke

ast amount of data on the Web

Highlighted by ajeschke

more critical thinking

Highlighted by ajeschke

The vast amount of data on the Web requires more critical thinking than was needed when I was growing up.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

Thinking

Highlighted by mjdaniel

Critical

Highlighted by mjdaniel

ong-time educators

Highlighted by ajeschke

own personal learning transformed

Highlighted by ajeschke

Having ready access to information does not make one a scholar, but it is scholars that we must help to create.

Highlighted by ajeschke

ABOUT CROWS
by John Ciardi

The old crow is getting slow;
the young crow is not.
Of what the young crow does not know,
the old crow knows a lot.

At knowing things, the old crow is still
the young crow’s master.
What does the old crow not know?
How to go faster.

The young crow flies above, below, and rings
around the slow old crow.
What does the fast young crow not know?
WHERE TO GO.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

First: we’ve developed a negative cultural impression of social networking that comes out of the very power that will makes it such an effective tool for education. Fundamentally answering a human need to connect, create, and express ourselves,

Highlighted by mjdaniel

ime and training

Highlighted by ajeschke

Third: Teachers will need time and training to learn to use these tools in the classroom,

Highlighted by mjdaniel

legal liabilities

Highlighted by ajeschke

Fourth: the legal liabilities that schools face because of concerns about a) student exposure to inappropriate material and b) exposure of students to potential predators will not be easy to overcome.

Highlighted by mjdaniel

don’t come with a manual

Highlighted by ajeschke

take time to build new “playbooks.

Highlighted by ajeschke

We’re long overdue for a really good discussion about the purpose of schools, and I believe that Web 2.0 will give us that opportunity

Highlighted by mjdaniel

Having ready access to information does not make one a scholar, but it is scholars that we must help to create.

Highlighted by sgallagher4