Intelligent Design? A Special Report from Natural History Ma...
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 15 people (5 private), first by anonymouse user on 2006-03-02
- Terry-b on 2008-04-11 - Tags Course , Related , Sites , 309
- Yogeshjangam on 2008-02-06 - Tags arch , biology , creationism , del.icio.us , evolution , imported , intelligentdesign , notinbookmarks , otr_vii , science
- Rjhintz on 2007-12-31 - Tags biology , evolution , intelligentdesign
- Einniv on 2007-12-17 - Tags edu , evolution , links
- Chemins on 2007-11-19 - Tags biology , evolution , id
Public Sticky notes
Irreducibly complex systems appear very unlikely to be produced by numerous, successive, slight modifications of prior systems, because any precursor that was missing a crucial part could not function.
Highlighted by diana9
We frequently observe such systems in cell organelles, in which the removal of one element would cause the whole system to cease functioning.
Highlighted by diana9
Biochemistry textbooks and journal articles describe the workings of some of the many living molecular machines within our cells, but they offer very little information about how these systems supposedly evolved by natural selection. Many scientists frankly admit their bewilderment about how they may have originated, but refuse to entertain the obvious hypothesis: that perhaps molecular machines appear to look designed because they really
are designed.
Highlighted by diana9
He argues that complex biochemical systems could not possibly have been produced by evolution because they possess a quality he calls irreducible complexity.
Highlighted by diana9
Three proponents of Intelligent Design (ID) present their views of design in the natural world.
Each view is immediately followed by a
response from a proponent of evolution (EVO).
Highlighted by rjhintz


Public Comment
on 2006-03-18 by kaalas
on 2006-10-25 by vdcastro