8 trends to capitalize on in 2008
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 39 people (-9 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-11-08
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by davidchavalarias
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by jengelsma
Highlighted by protaspegar
As indicated in the definition above, the rise of FREE LOVE* can be attributed to:
- An all-out war for consumers' attention (make that saturated consumers), including various handout and sampling techniques.
- The online world, with its amazing capacity to create, copy and distribute anything that's digital, with costs that are close to zero, forcing producers to come up with new business models/services, which are often purely ad-driven.
- The ever-decreasing cost of physical production makes it easier to offer more (nearly) free goods in the offline world too. In fact, many goods have actually become insanely cheap. Just one example: the price of televisions has fallen, on average, by 9 percent each year since 1998, according to U.S. Dept. of Labor data.
- The avalanche of free content created by attention-hungry members of GENERATION C.
- C2C marketplaces enabling consumers to swap instead of spend, making transactions cash-neutral.
- An emerging recycling culture.
- And all of the above fueling consumers' expectations to get online and offline stuff for free.
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by steveshock
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
FOREVER PRESENCE, with its effortless getting and staying in touch, is already facilitating a deafening (well, metaphorically speaking) conversation, that will continue between friends, family, strangers, foes, and yes, brands, in every possible combination until the end of times.
And while we have no intention of re-hashing the benefits of co-creation, we just want to point out that, ten years after the cluetrain manifesto (‘markets are conversations’) was published, it took a real-time publishing / conversation platform like Twitter to entice (big) brands to finally publicly interact with their customers.
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by katebeltrame
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by guypage
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Enough already!” is what you’ll increasingly hear from consumers around the world when faced with yet another corporate ‘eco’ vision or must-buy green product. In fact, serious ECO-FATIGUE is upon us, as independent and experienced consumers are fed up with being told what to do, or, more specifically, told what not to do. Treated like unruly infants by Al Gore and his ilk, the ECO-FATIGUED increasingly rebel against the green movement’s obsession with ‘no’.
In hindsight, ECO-FATIGUE was a trend waiting to happen: after all, eco clashes with two of the most profound and enduring mega consumer trends of all time: a lust for independence, and a craving for the real thing (also known as, dare we say it, ‘authenticity’). In short: being told to make do with half-baked versions—or even to entirely forgo one’s pleasures and indulgences—is just, well, not cool.
Highlighted by rmonte
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Student textbooks • U.S.-based Freeload Press provides free college textbooks in electronic form with advertisements inserted at chapter breaks. Inexpensive print-on-demand versions with no ads can be ordered for about USD 30. 'Customers' include students at four-year and two-year colleges throughout the U.S. and Canada. Freeload publishes primarily business and finance books. Students who register and complete a survey on Freeload's website can download a free PDF version of their textbook. Advertisers include Discover Card, PricewaterhouseCoopers and the College Loan Corporation.
In Europe, Danish Ventus Publishing runs a similar concept in 5 countries: (Denmark, Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium). Ventus offers titles in the fields of economics, science and engineering, featuring ads from companies such as T-Mobile, British Airways and Deutsche Bank every four pages.
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by pr9168
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina
As Jeff Jarvis (yes, him again) first noted ages ago (i.e. April 2007):
Interviews and articles need never end. And never start. A story can begin with a reader’s blog post: ‘I wish I knew…’ Or it can begin with a reporter’s blog post: ‘I’m looking at doing a story about ____. What do you know? What do you want to know? What should I ask? Whom should I ask?’ Who says the reporters should ask all the questions? Shouldn’t the readers? Then the interviews can appear online to be challenged, amended, and corrected by writers, readers, and subjects alike. Then the reporter writes a story.
But who says the story should be over then — done, fishwrap — just because the reporter’s finished writing it? The story is online and it continues to live and grow as people add their knowledge and perspectives and corrections . So the article isn’t a product. It is a process. It’s alive.”
Highlighted by jamiereverb
Highlighted by jamiereverb
If giving is the new taking, then hundreds of thousands consumers/individuals are on the right path. Never before have we witnessed such an explosion of free content, courtesy of individuals who—for free, nada, zilch—are happy to share their thinking, their novels, their photos, their movies, their music, their knowledge and expertise, their advice, their crafts and more.
Call it GENERATION C, the HOBBY ECONOMY, the GIFT ECONOMY or CROWD MINING, as long as you don't forget that besides undeniable passion, this user-generated FREE LOVE provides participants with visibility, with respect, with status. Even if they participate anonymously (Wikipedia is a good example), it gives them bragging rights among other GENERATION C members.
Now, we’ve written and spoken about participation vs consumption so often that we won’t repeat the whole spiel, but two more thoughts:
Firstly, nothing indicates that user-generated content, both of the paid and the free kind, and in all its variety, is not here to stay.
Secondly, if many consumers are now producers too, and if they mostly produce for free, will they not expect a similar sharing and loving attitude from corporations? So as a brand, not only may you find yourself competing directly with individuals doing what you do for free, but you will also be confronted with growing expectations for your brand to be giving rather than just taking.
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina


Public Comment