TALL blog » Blog Archive » Not ‘Natives’ & ‘Immigrants’ but ‘...
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
- digital_natives
- , digital
- , socialnetworking
- , web2.0
- , digitalnatives
- , socialsoftware
- , natives
- , residents
- , digital natives
- , lecturas_interesantes
- , digitalcitizenship
- , digital_native
- , 21centuryskills
- , digital natives_immigrants
- , digital immigrant
- , mediawijsheid
- , digital_resident
- , visitors_residents
- , digital literacy
Bookmark History
Saved by 19 people (-1 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-09-24
- Rogerneilson on 2009-10-06 - Tags digital
- Leohavemann on 2009-05-21 - Tags digitalnatives , digitaldivide , socialnetworking
- Timku1 on 2009-05-13 - Tags socialnetworking , socialsoftware , digitalnatives , digital_natives
- Heywayne on 2009-03-03 - Tags digital divide , digital immigrant , digital natives , digital literacy
- Jaap_w on 2009-03-02 - Tags mediawijsheid , digitalcitizenship , digitallive
Public Sticky notes
Not ‘Natives’ & ‘Immigrants’ but ‘Visitors’ & ‘Residents’
As part of the JISC funded Isthmus project we have been taking a close look not at what technologies our students use but at how our they use them. We found that our students could not be usefully categorised as Digital Natives or Digital Immigrants. I.e. This distinction does not help guide the implementation of technologies it simply provides the excuse that “some people ‘just don’t get it’ which is why your new approach has failed so badly…”
Anyway, our students appropriation of online services did not seem to follow a simple pattern based on skill level. It seemed to depend on if they saw the web as a ‘place to live’ or as a collection of useful tools. This underlying motivation led us to outline two main categories of distance learning student.
Highlighted by sappieurope
Highlighted by joevans1
Highlighted by joevans1
Highlighted by joevans1
Highlighted by joevans1


Public Comment