Placemaking « Stephen Rees’s blog
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 1 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-03-06
- Lampertina on 2008-03-06 - Tags jan_gehl , lectures , place_making , reference , stephen_rees , urbanism
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-03-06 by lampertina
- right, and I guess Duany's additonal question would be, 'why do we need the traffic OR pedestrian experts in the first place?' Shouldn't planners be well-rounded and generalist enough that they can approach problems from multiple perspectives, vs. ONLY from, say, a traffic engineering p.o.v.?
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-03-06 by lampertina
- Duany said the same thing, specifically castigating environmentalists who continue to advocate for every species EXCEPT people/humans, and who insist on seeing humanity as the problem. His take was that it's specifically the North-American-originated middle-class way of life that's the problem, not people as such. That particular group he links strongly with suburbs, not with rural or urban life.
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-03-06 by lampertina
I remember Strasbourg from the late 70s and early 80s, when cars still clotted the old town, and then seeing it after cars were banned from many of those narrow old streets. What a difference. When I was 17, I went to Paris by myself, and, sitting in a sidewalk cafe, I clearly thought, "The car has killed this city." That was over 30 years ago, but it seems Paris is FINALLY starting to realize that it needs to get a grip on the problem.
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-03-06 by lampertina
:-)
Q, In Vancouver we currently have the notion that density alone will cause these changes to happen
A. You have to be proactive. It has to be wider concept – “clever density” – do not take out the sun and make it windy – no one can see what is going on on the street 50 floors up. Senseless density won’t help – “high rise is the lazy architect’s solution to density” – you need “sensitivity in density”
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-03-06 by lampertina
- hmm, I think I prefer Duany's concept of the transect...
Q – shared space streets -
A – While the plan is to move that way, Gehl likes pedestrian priority better than shared streets. He was against the idea of traffic sign free streets being tried in Holland. He was very critical of that way to doing it – “people should be free of worry”. We need quality in how people feel about it, not just accident statistics.
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-03-06 by lampertina
- again, transects: that idea wouldn't work in every situation, but in some urban and in some rural areas, as well as small towns, it can work.
q – gentritfication?
a – There is no smart answer to that. When you improve the area new people move in. This should not stand in the way of improving cities. You also need a social policy. Bogota used transit as social policy providing good transit not more roads for cars improves the lot of the poor.
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina
on 2008-03-06 by lampertina
Ha!


Public Comment