What the Science REALLY Says About Global Warming
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 1 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-07-02
- Kropotkin on 2008-07-02 - Tags Climatechange
Public Sticky notes
As Watts’ team finds more and more stations such as the one in Marysville, it is becoming clear the US temperature records shows more warming than has actually occurred.
Highlighted by kropotkin
Furthermore, the IPCC, in dismissing this claim, cited one paper as its primary justification for concluding that UHIs (Urban Heat Islands) did not affect the global temperature record. But the paper that they cited is now recognized to have been a fraud, with formal charges filed against its author, Wei-Chyung Wang.
Highlighted by kropotkin
The most chilling thing of all, however, wasn’t so much the general acceptance this terrible science received in so much of the scientific community and in the media, but rather the outright persecution that arose when scientists began to refute the model.
Highlighted by kropotkin
Yet scientists who attempted to reveal the truth were attacked within their own communities. Why? Because Michal Mann’s paper ostensibly provided the “smoking gun” proving anthropogenic global warming, and the fact that it was based on disgraceful science was apparently immaterial.
Highlighted by kropotkin
Global warming is not about science, and it hasn’t been for some time. It is about politics, ideology, and power.
Highlighted by kropotkin


Public Comment