Good Math, Bad Math : The Genius of Donald Knuth: Typesetting...
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 3 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-01-11
- Sfcclibrary on 2008-05-06 - Tags math115
- Deitysteve on 2008-01-11 - Tags programming
- Joel on 2008-01-11 - Tags math , people , programming
Public Sticky notes
But on the whole, it's been a great thing. Pick up any conference proceedings
from the last 20 years, in the fields of math, computer science, physics, or chemistry (among numerous others), and you'll see the results of TeX layout. Pick up a book published by Springer-Verlag, and it's almost certainly typeset by TeX. Look at Greg Chaitin's books - every one was written using TeX. Look at any typeset equation in pretty much any published source, from websites to conference proceedings, to journals, to textbooks. If the equation looks really good, if everything is in exactly the right place, and every symbol is correctly drawn in relation to everything else - odds are, it was generated by TeX. Even hardcore Microsoft word users generally use something TeX based for doing equations.
Highlighted by joel


Public Comment