Framing Science : The Ethics of Framing Science: Four Guiding...
Popularity Report
 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rank
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 2 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2009-03-30
- Forestfortrees on 2009-03-30 - Tags framing , science , evolution , controversy , communications , ethics
- Oldephartte on 2009-03-30 - Tags framing , guiding
Public Sticky notes
upcoming April 13
Highlighted by forestfortrees
dialogue should be a focus of science communication efforts, rather than traditional top-down and one-way transmission approaches.
Highlighted by forestfortrees
scientists and journalists should always emphasize the values-based reasons for a specific policy action.
Highlighted by forestfortrees
accuracy is a third ethical imperative.
Highlighted by forestfortrees
avoid using framing to denigrate, stereotype, or attack a particular social group or to use framing in the service of partisan or electoral gains.
Highlighted by forestfortrees
Framing will always be an effective and legitimate part of social criticism and electoral politics, but for scientists and journalists to simplistically define critiques of religion or opposition to a candidate as a "matter of science" only further fuels polarization, alienating key publics and jeopardizing the perceived legitimacy of science.
Highlighted by forestfortrees
(see YouTube clip)
Highlighted by forestfortrees
Public Comment