Your Creation Museum Report
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 9 people (-4 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-11-20
- Smiley on 2008-04-11 - Tags museum , science , christianity , humor , religion , creationism , evolution , essay , scalze
- Cburell on 2007-11-23 - Tags christianity , creationism , evolution , humor , religion , satire , science , usa
- Peneli on 2007-11-20 - Tags no_tag
- Jmilles on 2007-11-16 - Tags imported , Current , creationism
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by peneli
Highlighted by peneli
Highlighted by peneli
It’s a little idiotic to establish as a “fact” that both science and creationism acknowledge, say, that apes exist, but to paper over the difference in the set of “facts” that explain how the apes got here, or to imply that a creationist assertion (apes created on the fifth day) is logically or systematically equivalent to decades of rigorous scientific process in the exploration of evolution.
Highlighted by peneli
Highlighted by peneli
very single thing on display in the Creation Museum is either caused by or a consequence of exactly three things:
1. The six-day creation;
2. Adam eating from the tree of life;
3. Noah’s flood.
Highlighted by peneli
Highlighted by peneli
Highlighted by peneli
Highlighted by peneli
Highlighted by peneli
Highlighted by peneli
Highlighted by peneli


Public Comment