Skip to main content

Hacking Education Transcript

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Bookmark History

Saved by 4 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2009-05-25


Public Sticky notes

education, I believe, systematically -- not
   deliberately, I think this is important -- but
   systematically, tends to divert people from their
   natural talent.

Highlighted by willrich

That education systems around the world were
   originally evolved almost specifically to meet the
   needs of industrialism.

Highlighted by willrich

But there is a second parent of
   education, which is the intellectual culture of
   enlightenment, which is a view of intelligence that
   reduces intelligence and affects a certain type of
   deductive reasoning.

Highlighted by willrich

We need to reinvent education,
   properly, for the 21st century.  But we have to do
   it, then, based on a different sense of economic
   purpose or economic circumstances.  But critically,
   we have to build into it a different sense of
   intelligence and creativity.

Highlighted by willrich

the revolution is
   being triggered in part by the impact of these new
   technologies around the world.  It changed the
   whole equation.

Highlighted by willrich

But our kids are telling us something
   important, that they have drawn constantly through
   these technologies.  They think about it
   differently.  They engage in the process and most
   of the people in the educational system are beyond
   the point in their lives where they're really fully
   aware of the impact in technology.

Highlighted by willrich

But the thing is, these technologies are
   transformative, not just economically but
   culturally.

Highlighted by willrich

So my take on this is that education
   has three main purposes.  One of them is
   economical.  There is no doubt in my mind that
   education of all sorts has clear and powerful and
   essential economic purposes, and any attempt to
   transform education has to take account of it.
               The problem is that the old economic
   model doesn't work and none of us can figure out
   how new economic models would fall out.  So, that,
   to me, puts a premium on innovation and creativity.
   We have to think hard about that.
               The second big purpose of education is
   cultural.  Everybody expects education will enable
   kids to engage with the culture out of their own
   sense of identity, and be part of the culture in
   the global sense.
               But how do you do that?
               The third big part of education is
   personal.  Education has to focus also on personal
   capability and what makes us distinct, as well as
   what we have in common.  And that, for the moment,
   flattens out in the current systems of education.
   Because the way in which we're promoting schools is
   through standardizing rather than through
   personalizing, customizing.

Highlighted by willrich

And the whole point about these
   technologies is they are not... control.  They are
   vernacular, they are grassroots and they are
   cross-fertilizing technologies.  How you stimulate
   those, how you make them grow, is, of course, a big
   challenge to the conversation.

Highlighted by willrich

And the great
   thing about these technologies is a way of
   calibrating the personal involvement in the way
   that they never did before.

Highlighted by willrich

what's the heart of education?  What is
   the irreducible minimum?  In public education, I
   think we've lost sight of it.  The heart of
   education is what happens in the hearts and minds
   of individual learners.  You cannot make anybody
   learn anything that they're not interested in
   learning, if they don't see and feel the relevance
   of it.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-25 by willrich

Great way to focus the question. What is the core, and what are we doing that gets us further away from the core, which is individual learners learning and loving learning. Isn't education almost solely about fostering a love of learning? Anything else is secondary.

And what we've got now in this
   industrialized system is a multitude of
   distractions from this central purpose.  The heart
   of it is falling out of it because kids aren't
   interested.  What we have here is, an opportunity
   to really engage kids' imaginations by giving them
   education, using these technologies not to get in
   the way but to enhance and properly develop --
   collaboratively and creatively.

Highlighted by willrich

He said, people graduating from school
   now, their goal should not be to get a job; their
   goal should be to create jobs for other people.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-25 by willrich

Great quote.

And if you're in college for four years --
   in my experience, college degrees, their value in
   the job market is getting less and less, but their
   cost is increasing.

Highlighted by willrich

You know, there's people who just get
   rejected in the system.  You can't go through it
   and they find other paths.  And with the Web
   nowadays, I think there's never been more
   opportunity to find these other paths and connect
   with other people.

Highlighted by willrich

I teach entrepreneurial journalism,
   which is not an oxymoron, at the City University of
   New York.  And it's all about them creating
   whatever they can create and helping them do that.
   And so, how can we help students create and, in
   that process, learn?  And we are not built to do
   that at all.  We are built to put out cookie
   cutters and make them pass tests.

Highlighted by willrich

Do we prepare them for service class labor or
   should we be thinking about how we prepare people
   to find stuff that's not just about labor per se,
   but about enjoying their life more broadly?  And
   this is where the creativity comes in.

Highlighted by willrich

Many of us in the room get to live --
   you know, our work and leisure are sort of blended
   into one.  We love what we are doing.  But can we
   really truly expect everybody to be in that kind of
   job mind set?  And when do we have to actually
   think about the balancing of the work and pleasure
   and how we actually educate people to be happy?

Highlighted by willrich

the idea of broadening the
   notion of education to be a lifelong idea and
   how the work that Paul -- the school, everything --
   and Dave are doing around, saying that everyone's
   got something to teach, everyone's got something to
   learn.

Highlighted by willrich

Teachers invest so much time, so much
   energy trying to manage a class, and by the time
   they've done that, there's so little energy to
   actually differentiate the instruction, personalize
   instruction.

Highlighted by willrich

It's kind of an intrinsic reward of the
   group to be smarter and to be more passionate in
   some way, to get to Sir Ken's idea, that the group
   really rewarded people who really got obsessed with
   something and has something, whether writing plays
   or write short stories or doing art or whatever it
   was.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-25 by willrich

How do we foster obsession?

And
   that's where a lot of the passion comes from,
   developing your voice, because that's important, to
   give you the opportunity to create, create the rule
   of creativity.  And we don't give enough
   opportunities for people to create.

Highlighted by willrich

I
   think that one of the goals have to be that
   education has to evolve with the user;

Highlighted by sharonbetts

on 2009-06-07 by sharonbetts

should this not be the goal of educational reform?

teachers teaching students, students teaching
   teachers, teachers teaching teachers and students
   teaching students.

Highlighted by willrich

a fundamental
   tension between the ideas of education and the
   notion of learning.

Highlighted by willrich

And I think that what we are really
   trying to talk about is learning as the space of
   innovation and transformation and not so much
   education.  Because we see innovation in the space
   of learning all over the place today, in terms of
   how people are coming to learn things, how people
   are sharing information.  We are not seeing
   innovation in the space of education because of its
   institutionalization.
               So, I think that the space that we
   really want to begin to understand is how learning
   itself is a form of currency today for young
   people.  It's actually valued, and this is what you
   were talking about.
               Learning is actually valued in very
   interesting ways by young people today; not so much
   in school, but in spaces outside of school where
   they're really learning how to do things.  And it
   goes to the conversation of, if one of our goals is
   to allow people to move into a future; that they
   are able to learn, able to adapt to any kind of
   change, whether they're changing jobs, whether
   they're changing what they're passionate about.
   That, I think, is the best thing that we can do for
   people is to give them that kind of skill set.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-25 by willrich

This is a pretty shifted thought, that learning is currency for kids today for things outside of school.

But if you talk to educators they say
   they're in the learning business, but it is,
   actually, they are not.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-25 by willrich

Begs the question as to what is the difference between knowledge and learning. Learning is a process, knowledge is a thing? An event?

on 2009-06-07 by sharonbetts

I agree - most educators are in the teaching business. and most teaching is for the assessment business. Learning is getting lost.

you're talking about something that was
   self-directed, completely outside of the system,
   but enabled by the medium that we are now all
   swimming in and it either creates an opportunity to
   help people learn even if we don't figure out how
   to reform the system.

Highlighted by willrich

This is something that's
   available to a nine-year-old that wasn't available
   before; that nonlocal reputation, that global
   reputation of a niche reputation on the web.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-25 by willrich

I would argue that's something we have to help kids cultivate.

nonlocal reputation

Highlighted by willrich

We pooh-pooh this often as like
   something that's fully irrelevant education, but we
   all, as adults, rely on those skills, those very
   social skills they've gotten us into this room,
   that we have to learn.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-25 by willrich

Great point.

And even if they do, they don't really
   have the cultural ability to take the stance,
   express themselves, connect to people below, above,
   and on the side, and build stuff.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-25 by willrich

This is a huge deal. How do we teach kids to participate in these spaces in ways that express, communicate, connect and build?

a teacher
   in front of 30 people with no computers, it will
   not work anymore.

Highlighted by willrich

So, basically, it just took the raw
   material that's already on YouTube, pop on the
   videos, put a little technology layer on top of it,
   and they were teaching millions of Chinese kids how
   to speak English.

Highlighted by willrich

Learning is
   ecological, and it happens in many places
   simultaneously.

Highlighted by willrich

How do
   we enable just connectors between some of these
   different spaces, whether they're content
   connectors or mentor connectors or even a
   validation that what a kid might be doing in an
   after-school space is relevant and valid within an
   in-school space?

Highlighted by willrich

Our model of learning
   has to exist within that certain networked idea, as
   well.

Highlighted by willrich

but the credentialing system is
   one that hasn't changed at all.

Highlighted by willrich

I learned how to be obsessed with
   things.

Highlighted by willrich

So, how do you teach kids to be
   obsessed with things?  I think one of the
   advantages we have with technology and particularly
   with games is that they have built-in structure,
   almost to a fault, as most parents would say.
   They have an addictive quality where people will
   just immerse themselves and become obsessed with
   them, something in that structure.

Highlighted by willrich

The product is becoming
   the credential.  In the old days, I went to school,
   I got a grade, I presented the grade and I got a
   job.  And now, what happens is, you create this
   game; and that game is what creates your
   reputation.  And there's no grade there.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

This, if true, is huge.

And if you think about the Web as a
   medium in a way, that's the way people are creating
   their own credentials. 

Highlighted by willrich

And I think it's fundamentally changing
   what we need from education, to Scott's question.
   What we need is to become familiar with the tools
   that we use to promote our ideas and really,
   basically, to search engine optimize our products
   or the things we created.

Highlighted by willrich

There are several people in the room that are
   really working very hard to create an assessment
   that relates to imagination, innovation,
   creativity, coming up with an idea, beginning a
   project from the beginning, middle, end; delivering
   this in digital form, sharing, exposing,
   presenting.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

Is this the process that we need to assess? Is this learning to learn?

When I've taught classes, I
   throw this out for somebody else to use, tell the
   students you can't get an A from the teacher.  The
   best you can get from the teacher is a B+, because
   the teacher-student grading relationship is
   corrupting.
               So, if you want to get an A, you've got
   to get somebody outside.  And in a video game
   class, you got to get 10,000 downloads as an A.  I
   would suggest in journalism, somebody's doing
   entrepreneurial journalism, that you've got to get
   a certain amount of blog readers per a month to get
   an A and --

Highlighted by willrich

Technology does enable us
   to bring education everywhere.

Highlighted by willrich

we used to consider the teachers as
   the source of the knowledge.  Well, I'm not sure if
   they ever were, but definitely they're not right
   now.  And the technology enables the kids to go and
   get all the information that they need outside of
   the classroom.

Highlighted by willrich

We can do this completely revolutionary
   thing in giving a student a pretest and then
   pulling out the materials that they already know
   and creating a personalized path instead of
   four weeks training, maybe, let's say, two and a
   half or maybe, let's say, three weeks in one and a
   half.  Maybe you finish the course in a four-week
   period instead of the whole semester.
               The idea then of a pre-test, based on
   what the students already know, is older than dirt,
   probably.  But this is one place that technology
   gives us a leverage point.  With something as
   simple as aligning the assessment with the content
   and the standard in the middle to connect them to
   each other.  Pre-assessment, pass the standard, and
   I'll just pull the content out to build path for
   you.

Highlighted by willrich

Do I want the doctor
   who is most certified, or the doctor who has the
   most followers on Twitter?

Highlighted by willrich

And the way I think it
   leverages fantastic is, terrific, passionate
   teachers.  If I have passionate teacher Ph.D.s in
   La Crosse, Wisconsin, who love CFAs.
               With a credit card and a broadband
   connection, you can be anywhere in the world, and
   start learning from them in a minute.  It's
   incredibly powerful.

Highlighted by willrich

And so, how do we actually think about
   technology, not just as technologies themselves but
   within that sort of ecology of how you actually
   make this leverage work and to make it work for
   you.  Teachers are critical for this.
               It is actually not learning from
   teachers in another environment, but figuring out
   how teachers can give you and work with you to
   understand how you engage with these technologies
   to do something important.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

To do something important...that is the key now.

The learning environment becomes
   transparent, and teachers are extremely important.
   It can be a teacher that is physically with us in
   the room, or it can be people who are coming from
   outside of the room because of the network.
               So, it is the network environment that
   is transparent with tools that allow you to build
   and construct digital media, to learn through
   design, to learn by teaching; you teach and you
   learn in the same environment and there is the
   expert guidance.

Highlighted by willrich

They need to learn how to reflect on their own
   knowledge or lack of it and to reflect on their own
   learning.  And that is actually something which is
   not explicit anywhere into the curriculum or often
   in the classroom, but is an essential outlearning
   outcome, if you will.

Highlighted by willrich

Talking about learning
   through technology.  It is the practice, a large
   part.  It's not just the information push.  It is
   the practices around, what you do by navigating, by
   negotiating, interpreting, evaluating and playing
   with that information.  And that's where it plays
   an important role for whether it's the mentor or
   the teacher or the staff or whatever term you use
   when --

Highlighted by willrich

But how
   do we give parents the tools which they can
   actually engage with their kids across language,
   across cultural barriers, across all these other
   things, so you can make the partnerships much more
   obvious?
               It's not even just about how do we
   intercept learning with directly with kids, but
   affecting the larger ecology.  And there's a lot
   more opportunity for technology there, first and
   foremost, and directly to the kids.

Highlighted by willrich

But it doesn't by itself change the...
   it expands the possibilities for active
   information, making things in connection with other
   people.  But what the real role of teachers,
   mentors, parents, is to guide -- how do you go
   about active information and making things?  That's
   not obvious.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

How does my teacher learn? My parents?

I think we're going
   to have a marketplace model for education where the
   student is in control of their education and they
   determine who is going to educate them, when, where
   and how, and the educational system can be built
   into all of that.

Highlighted by willrich

It is now possible for the learners to define what
   are the goals they want to achieve; and end up with
   a personalized curriculum that meets those goals,
   and it may meet the accreditation goals, too, or
   not.  But the access is very valuable both in its
   own right also in terms of metaschool's skill of
   encouraging learners to define their learning goals
   and then try to achieve them.

Highlighted by willrich

getting your content here, your research
   there, your help there, your credential over here.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

A piecemeal approach to education. This is what I've been talking about.

I think, to me, as a
   teacher on the one hand, the technology
   offers...access to amazing teachers in any subject.
   I can find AN online facilitator.

Highlighted by willrich

Open source, open
   courseware.  It doesn't make the university tuition
   free.  Basically, everything that is available for
   free.  So, we take the content that is available
   online, and we take open -- we use open source
   technology.
               And I think that what is actually very
   unique about what we do is, we apply social
   networking into that.  So, there are not going to
   be teachers in the classroom.  Students are going
   to teach each other.  If you are teaching -- and
   there will be a forum where they can get help or
   professors.  However, in the classroom itself, the
   studies will be through discussion between the
   students with each other on the topics.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

University of the People. Wondering how this is assessed.

That's where our
   partnerships come in.  So, we have a partnership
   with these school universities, so kids -- and
   we're working there with sets of academics that are
   interested in having young people come for work
   with graduate students.  And then we have a set of
   industry partnerships where kids can --
   particularly in eighth and ninth grade, they're
   going to have to sort of work in groups.  So, we
   can't sort of send sixth graders or seventh graders
   out into the city.  But we're looking at kinds of
   programs that can sit inside some different
   institutions that will support kids in that sort of
   internship.  So, it has to do with partnerships and
   we've started trying to build those early on

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

Quest to Learn School built on gaming curricula in NYC

No.   It is quite open and
   internships may be virtual.  They may be online
   where kids are having a chance in some online
   communities to intern in a virtual world, for
   example, learn something about that.
              MR. RESNICK:  To make the walls a little
   bit more permeable so that it gives off a portal
   for the community; it could be part of the
   community public?

Highlighted by willrich

So, the other piece that
   we're having to work on which has come up a lot
   lately is the assessment issue.  So, we have
   received some opening of permissions from the State
   to develop an alternative assessment model that
   begins to look at competencies that can be granted
   both within industry by academic institutions and
   by other kinds of individuals.  So, that's
   something that will happen over time.
               And our goal is to try to say kids
   should be able to get credit by doing work in lots
   of different kind of phases, not just within --
   within an academic institution so that there would
   be a process by which people will be able to be
   considered accreditable or to be able to give a
   credit in some sense; yes.

Highlighted by willrich

Yes.  An alternate model
   around competencies.  So, we have a model where
   kids are earning badges.  And so, it's some sort of
   a portfolio model that by the time they graduate,
   that the evidence of participation and of certain
   kinds of excellence become a measure of their
   success as a graduate.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

This is where it gets really interesting, I think. Creating routes to mastery. "Every child becoming an expert in something they feel passionate about." I want that.

es, exactly.  Our whole
   goal is to let kids be a master of something by the
   time they graduate.  We think that's a huge goal,
   to allow every child to feel that they have become
   an expert in something that they feel passionate
   about.
               And ideally, be supported around what
   we would call "functional literacies" and we were
   talking about within this group reading, writing,
   math; yes, absolutely.  But the other stuff, kids
   become what they want to become and build what they
   want to build with their lives, based on how they
   gather knowledge and utilize it.  So, that's the
   model that we're aiming at.

Highlighted by willrich

So, we've been thinking about not
   having grade levels.  So, we're having sort of
   phases that kids can move at their own pace, their
   own pace within.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

Wow.

So, the curriculum is disseminated
   through a game-like structure.  So, kids are given
   a ten-week mission, and that mission drops them
   into a complex problem space and then that mission
   is broken down into a series of smaller quests that
   allows kids to build skills and knowledge in order
   to solve that problem.

Highlighted by willrich

Yes.  And so, our curriculum
   is co-developed by teachers and game designers.
   So, that was the other model that we're looking at,
   that it may be a new type of collaboration that
   could be to invent a curriculum.

Highlighted by willrich

We have an online social
   network that we built for the school called "Be Me"
   and it's the idea that we want kids to play around
   with multiple identities and to recognize that
   they, at any one time, may be taking on different
   identities.  There's an "at model" in it called
   "The Expertise Exchange."
               We're also trying to get kids to
   understand what they are experts in, what they want
   to be experts in, what they're not good at.  So,
   this notion of how do you find other people to work
   with, other kinds of mentors and that kind of
   thing.  So, the multiple identity thing is a big
   one.  The notion of the curriculum -- and then I'll
   shut up because I don't want to dominate here -- is
   allowing kids to step into identities.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-26 by willrich

Teaching multiple identities. Nice.

So, one thing we found with kids is
   that the ability to give them that -- the idea to
   give them the ability to share what they have done
   is super critical to them and to make choices about
   who they're sharing it with.
               We're trying to build in mechanisms by
   which they can export things that they were doing
   in the space for more public kind of space; whether
   if it's public in a sense of their small group of
   friends or their parents or whether it's to the
   world.  So, the publication notion is a big one in
   the school about outward facing.

Highlighted by willrich

And so, I think we found that it's
   really about stripping, stripping away and
   understanding what, who are the participants in any
   learning moment.  So, trying not to get to
   over-design what the teacher does, not to
   over-design what the student does and understand
   that the student brings things, the teacher brings
   things.

Highlighted by willrich

And I think we talked a lot about these
   ideas today, finding things that you need on Google
   or in your community, and finding -- gain experts
   or content experts or programming experts, design
   experts on this network that we are putting and
   that are starting to take each other, all for free
   and available through the governor that is
   financing it.

Highlighted by willrich

There's a global revolution
   online.  But I don't want a global revolution.  I
   want to share with the person down the hall.

Highlighted by willrich

Yes.  I was shocked.  When I
   was teaching sixth-grade social studies, and I
   said, Well, I don't really know what I'm doing with
   that, so I'm trying to find another middle school
   social studies teacher in Georgia that knows what
   they're doing.  It just doesn't exist.
               Like, literally, you have to guess,
   scour blogs.  It just doesn't exist.  So, the
   ability to find other people teaching what you are
   teaching, being able to have some sort of dialogue.
   There's a massive need for it.

Highlighted by willrich

So, it is a fundamentally, teachers
   want to share and, like any artist, want to share
   and they want to be recognized.  So, we're trying
   to use the Web to recognize.  And if they were
   teachers, our Web will target rock stars.

Highlighted by willrich

And it is really interesting that,
   basically, it's a growing group, made up of an
   economically driven -- I don't know.  There's so
   many people that are turning their passions,
   supporting their passions by teaching them.  And
   so, they may have a day job, but they are finding a
   way to make that leap out of a job that they don't
   like into maybe they're teaching something that
   they do like as a way of supporting -- doing what
   they like.

Highlighted by willrich

And is there a reputation
   system?
              MR. MILLER:  Yes.  Basically,
   endorsements.  One thing we found is that teachers
   were very wary of five-star systems around
   teaching, because they think it is a bad
   relationship with a student and that that's
   basically subjective.  So, teachers are suspicious,
   we found, when we talked to them of objective
   representation systems when it comes to teaching.

Highlighted by willrich

What we are trying to build we think is
   a massive marketplace around things that people are
   passionate about.  And so, a lot of what was being
   discussed today, I hope you all figured it out, and
   it's sort of like the learning up to age 22, 23,
   when you get the confidence to go and learn
   whatever it is that you are excited about.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-27 by willrich

Interesting perspective

It is really is about learning --
   that's the difference, the accreditation issue
   isn't something we're trying to tackle.  We don't
   really go after the college education or even the
   grades K to 12.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-27 by willrich

This is really key. If you can do something, do it transparently so others can find you, do it well so others can rate you, you don't need the traditional creds (?)

what's like going to come -- we're
   going to start realizing that we and our kids are
   just realizing that if they're not going to get it
   in school, they'll have to get it somewhere.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-27 by willrich

Quotable

And it's pretty similar to
   us.  Our three main categories are crafts, music,
   languages and arts.  But what surprises us is, kind
   of sustainable environmental stuff.  That really
   seems to be that passionate people -- the teaching
   people about environment and the sustainability
   that we haven't expected.

Highlighted by willrich

Anybody can start a class in whatever
   they're passionate about.

Highlighted by willrich

I absolutely can, because
   right now we often use Craig's List, honestly.  For
   us, it's economical.  And oftentimes, if we are
   looking for a Spanish teacher -- we've gone to
   Craig's List to find someone good at philosophy --
   like somebody would come in and talk with the child
   about philosophy --

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-27 by willrich

Using Craig's list to find teachers...hmmm.

But to relate to the other question of
   what takes off in a network, we realize there is a
   small network of innovators and it relates to some
   of what I have said.  They really need to figure
   out how to create these innovative things that they
   are willing to jump in and trying to take a risk
   and connect it to what they call the content
   standards that -- the things that are out there.

Highlighted by willrich

I want to say a thing or two
   about the Open High School in Utah.  And we talked
   a little bit this morning about ways we're using
   technology.  Open High School of Utah is an open
   charter school. And in our charter, we committed
   ourselves to exclusively using open educational
   resources.
               So, in terms of teachers sharing items
   as opposed to sharing lesson plans and resources,
   we've done a complete textbook replacement, all the
   material on everything you need to run the course
   is what we're providing with open source for
   everyone.

Highlighted by willrich

And also, I have a mission, not to
   scale our individual school out to the world; but
   when there's a completely open curriculum available
   and a charter application documents and budgets and
   things are available, other people just pick up and
   start these schools.  We don't have to be involved
   and the curriculum is free, things like that.
               In addition to the personalization and
   the individualization I was talking about earlier
   today, the point of open source.

Highlighted by willrich

And that's a question that I don't know
   when it comes to education.  It seems to me pretty
   clear that the way that kids are still being taught
   these days, and the fact that there's a computer
   that's over there in the corner of the classroom,
   but that's only the extent to which technology may
   play a role, it sort of seems like it is broken to
   me.
               And I feel like, as more and more
   people understand that something isn't right, that
   we are using technology all throughout the day but
   our students aren't using it on a hands on way in
   the classroom; then it opens up a real opportunity
   for starting integrating office tools that people
   are starting to develop now, actually in the
   classroom, in students' hands.

Highlighted by willrich

Until there's a cultural
   movement, until it's understood in a broader
   content that our schools aren't working.

Highlighted by willrich

In the State of Utah, I can
   tell you, if we got this curriculum rolled out.
   And the kids will get it this fall and are going to
   make a YP at the end of the year.  The next summer,
   there's conversations about what to do with the
   textbooks we have to replace and with the money
   supposed to be spent on curriculum?
               And there's a completely open source
   curriculum, and we can show kids YP when they use
   it.  It kind of forces a lot of really interesting
   conversations and that is a very strong secondary
   goal.

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-27 by willrich

So this is a fascinating scenario...when the open source school makes AYP...

I do think, my sense as a general
   consensus of the public, is they recognize that
   healthcare as a crisis, energy is in crisis.  I
   don't think there's as much of an understanding of
   what this group has that education needs to be
   hacked. 

Highlighted by willrich

Again, it's a matter of
   timing.  I go back to the fact that the economy is
   crap right now.  You have an opportunity to
   actually do a high-prestige, high-status shift
   within the talent pool.

Highlighted by willrich

I think that is the fundamental
   issue, sort of the detriment to creating a good
   school culture in K through 12.  And I think a good
   school culture is key to the teachings and
   learning.  And so, I think the only way to hack the
   monopoly is through competitions and creating good
   schools and giving parents a choice.

Highlighted by willrich

And in general, my take from Fred's
   point was the rock star.  The rock star teacher
   isn't about teaching at Yankee Stadium like the
   story over here and making a million bucks.  It's
   about having their reputation in the teaching world
   be the rock star, because people are using their
   lesson plan, using their --

Highlighted by willrich

But I think the
   cost of virtual, even virtually nonphysical
   professional development and training for and
   innovation, when you have to take -- all the range,
   from not very qualified or talented to the most
   talented and faster learner type of instructors or
   teachers to really scale is the largest cost.
               You said "people," but I don't know if
   you meant that.  Even if you run a one hour once a
   week session for people to come and learn how to
   teach and learn in a new way in the system, even if
   they don't end up in a physical space; that's from
   my analysis of budget in the last three years when
   we were running Globaloria, is the largest cost
   item.

Highlighted by willrich

On the people side, why
   don't you just require as a requirement to graduate
   high school, you have to teach other people.  You
   show that you've learned best when you're teaching
   something to other people.  So, just require high
   school students to teach --

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-27 by willrich

Cool idea. Every student is a teacher...setting up their own classrooms, writing their own curricula, etc.

I think that's where the real
   paradigm shift is here now, where people can learn
   from other experts regardless of their age,
   regardless of their background, and be judged or
   assessed on what they actually take in or what they
   put out. 

Highlighted by willrich

you begin to work around the
   limitations of the classroom and you find a tutor,
   and Fred's hired a guy to teach his kids how to
   code.

Highlighted by willrich

I always ask, why does
   education seem to be the last thing we're going to
   get a handle on?  Technology seems really well used
   in the corporate sector, in health corporations,
   the military obviously knows how to do it, politics
   is starting to totally get it.
               Why, when most of us are parents, we
   care about education, why is it that technology and
   education as a marriage is like the last?

Highlighted by willrich

on 2009-05-27 by willrich

I wonder this too.

it's the system that's the most tightly
   controlled by lots of different interests; and that
   slows down innovation because the big system and
   the innovation doesn't fit inside the existing
   system and the system changes slowly.

Highlighted by sharonbetts

on 2009-06-07 by sharonbetts

the control slows innovation - and how do we disperse the control and open the walls?

And I think the next teachers, to think
   about teachers as innovators, innovators as
   teachers in the relationship, the paradigm between
   those two things.

Highlighted by willrich