No tenure for Technorati: Science and the Social Web - john w...
Popularity Report
 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rank
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 2 people (-1 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-11-22
- Cwhooker on 2009-05-02 - Tags
<_tag> , import090501 - Bibliothecaire on 2007-11-22 - Tags nature , open_science , recherche_2.0 , research , science , social_network , social_networks
Public Sticky notes
There’s three barriers to Social Web extracting the wisdom in sciences as it does elsewhere.
Highlighted by bibliothecaire
The first is the lack of a crowd – not only is the total number of scientists in any one field pretty low in terms of internet numbers, but it’s even lower in reality with specialization.
Highlighted by bibliothecaire
Second problem is that scientific communication is a different beast than normal human communication. Scientists talk to their friends, but when talking to people they don’t know, it’s much more formal. They use communication to spec theories and to claim ground as theirs.
Highlighted by bibliothecaire
It’s not a matter of “web 2.0 technology will trump old ways of sharing stuff” (a statement I tend to believe is true) but a matter of “stuff that doesn’t get shared anyway isn’t likely to get shared simply because the technology exists to share it.”
Highlighted by bibliothecaire
Third problem is that there are no rewards for participating in these new forms of communication. Thus the title of the post. Has anyone gotten tenure for a well-linked blog in the life sciences?
Highlighted by bibliothecaire
Citations are a place in science where you have demonstrated something to be true (or at least an approximation of truth). They’re a formal style of communication that says, not only is this a fact of nature, but I – ME - am the one who proved it to be so.
Highlighted by bibliothecaire
Public Comment