In case anyone missed this....check out the "5 Stupid Implica...
Popularity Report
 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rank
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 5 people (-1 private), first by anonymouse user on 2009-01-15
- Plagiarismtoday on 2009-01-15 - Tags 94 , youtube , music , takedown , dmca
- Homo_superior on 2009-01-15 - Tags YouTube , copyright , record labels , reading list
- Enkerli on 2009-01-15 - Tags no_tag
- Freesecrets on 2009-01-15 - Tags youtube , copyright , muted , music , video , audio , muting , rickroll , lists , web , 2.0 , social , networking
- Cchesher on 2009-01-15 - Tags remixable , media , music , audio , YouTube , fromdelicious
Public Sticky notes
Yesterday we broke a story about YouTube muting videos that use unauthorized copyrighted music as the audio. Since then, users have been trying it out with dozens of copyrighted audio tracks and it seems that this will definitely happen often in the future, as the library of “banned” music is quite extensive.
I don’t understand why any copyright holder could prefer removing his/her audio track to simply slapping some ads and trying to monetize the fact that someone, somewhere, likes their song.
Highlighted by homo_superior
Public Comment