Required Reading: the next 10 years (Lessig Blog)
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
- politics
- , P2P-Policy
- , warming
- , corruption
- , lessig
- , property
- , intellectual
- , freedom
- , future
- , P2P
- , Law
- , global
- , General
- , blog
Bookmark History
Saved by 4 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-07-12
- Zoharma on 2007-10-02 - Tags freedom , future , Law , politics , blog , lessig
- Humbleopinion on 2007-10-01 - Tags General
- Safetyneal on 2007-07-12 - Tags corruption , global , intellectual , politics , property , warming
- Mbauwens on 2007-06-29 - Tags P2P-Policy , P2P
Public Sticky notes
After talking about the basic inability of our political system to reckon the truth about global warming, Gore observed that this was really just part of a much bigger problem. That the real problem here was (what I will call a "corruption" of) the political process. That our government can't understand basic facts when strong interests have an interest in its misunderstanding.
This is a thought I've often had in the debates I've been a part of, especially with respect to IP. Think, for example, about term extension. From a public policy perspective, the question of extending existing copyright terms is, as Milton Friedman put it, a "no brainer." As the Gowers Commission concluded in Britain, a government should never extend an existing copyright term. No public regarding justification could justify the extraordinary deadweight loss that such extensions impose.
Yet governments continue to push ahead with this idiot idea -- both Britain and Japan for example are considering extending existing terms. Why?
The answer is a kind of corruption of the political process. Or better, a "corruption" of the political process. I don't mean corruption in the simple sense of bribery. I mean "corruption" in the sense that the system is so queered by the influence of money that it can't even get an issue as simple and clear as term extension right. Politicians are starved for the resources concentrated interests can provide. In the US, listening to money is the only way to secure reelection. And so an economy of influence bends public policy away from sense, always to dollars.
Highlighted by safetyneal


Public Comment