Skip to main content

i d e a n t: A del.icio.us study

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Bookmark History

Saved by 46 people (9 private), first by anonymouse user on 2006-03-31


Public Comment

on 2006-03-31 by kossatsch

via plainjochen

on 2006-10-26 by project-tnn

Article about studying tagging on del.icio.us

on 2006-11-09 by wbmook

Okay, maybe I'll actually read this at some point

Public Sticky notes

Working within the constraints of a very limited data sample, this study attempts to identify some of the information management and meaning construction practices of an online distributed classification (a.k.a. free tagging or ethnoclassification) community. Specifically, this study seeks to investigate the social and communicative practices that emerge when users are encouraged to share web links with one another by using a metadata keyword, or tag, to demark a social group, apart from using other tags to classify links according to an emergent taxonomy.

Highlighted by project-tnn

ou submit your links to a website, adding some descriptive text  and keywords, and del.icio.us aggregates your post with everyone  else's submissions--letting you slice and dice the information any way you like. Posts with the same keywords are clumped  together, and if enough people link to a URL, a loose classification emerges. (Biddulph, 2004)

Highlighted by dengcomm

Just six tags  (python, delicious/del.icio.us, programming, hacks, tools, and web)  account for 80% of all the tags chosen, and a long tail of 58  other tags make up the remaining 20%,

Highlighted by dengcomm

Key Concepts

Highlighted by dengcomm

it is hard for people to make the initial conceptual shift from traditional forms of classification (using fixed taxonomies) to distributed classification schemes (using flexible taxonomies). The freedom to define individual and social structures of classification emergently can be perceived as chaotic, lacking rigor and utility. However, the more comfortable users become with a system’s features, the more aware they become of the benefits of distributed classification, and the more aware they also become of working within its limitations.

Highlighted by dengcomm

It can be argued that distributed classification systems such as del.icio.us do not exhibit some of the features commonly thought of as necessary to support online communities (features such as the ability to access ‘profile’ knowledge about individual users, the ability to communicate directly with other users, and the ability to rate the quality of submissions). It seems that del.icio.us did not set out to become that kind of community tool, so those features might never become part of its toolset. However, one question to explore further is to what degree such features would enhance the sense of community, or if there are other ways in which del.icio.us accomplishing that.

Highlighted by dengcomm

are contributing not only to that particular community, but to the larger del.icio.us community and their efforts.

Highlighted by dengcomm