RfD: IEEE-FP - comp.lang.forth | Google 網上論壇
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Bookmark History
Public Sticky notes
David N. Williams <willi...@umich.edu> wrote:
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > It's worth saying here that FDUP x F! x F@ F= shall always return
>> > true. This ensures that the size of an FVARIABLE is big enough to
>> > hold a stack element.
>
>> Okay.
>
> This one may be a bit controversial, I warn you. I think some Forths
> use the full 80-bit FP stack but 64-bit F@ and F!. I think that's
> broken, but that's just IMO.
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > It's worth saying here that FDUP x F! x F@ F= shall always return
>> > true. This ensures that the size of an FVARIABLE is big enough to
>> > hold a stack element.
>
>> Okay.
>
> This one may be a bit controversial, I warn you. I think some Forths
> use the full 80-bit FP stack but 64-bit F@ and F!. I think that's
> broken, but that's just IMO.
Highlighted by hcchen


Public Comment