Digital Nativism
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 38 people (-2 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-10-25
- Anitsirk on 2009-11-08 - Tags digitalnatives , net-generation , controversy , criticism
- Jlearn20 on 2009-02-27 - Tags demographics
- Emilyvickery on 2008-12-31 - Tags digitalnatives , prensky , jamiemckenzie
- Silberguy on 2008-11-14 - Tags jimdunne
- Djubaka on 2008-10-04 - Tags digital_learning
Public Sticky notes
Their point of view is harsh and ill informed. Their stance is unsubstantiated by evidence and is little more than digital delusion. They are guilty of "arcade scholarship" -
Highlighted by jimfolk
He paints digital experience as wonderful and old ways as worthless.
Highlighted by jimfolk
Quick to stereotype generations, Prensky lumps all young ones together as digital natives even though reports like "Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8–18 Year-0lds" issued by the Kaiser Family Foundation paint a far more complex portrait and base their comments on data gathered through surveys. His stereotypes and sweeping comments seem fabricated through personal observations, strong bias and wishful thinking.
Highlighted by jimfolk
The authors of "Generation M" were surprised to learn that computer time accounted for only about 5% of young people's use of media.
Highlighted by jimfolk
Those who substitute FaceBook for face-to-face communities suffer many of the consequences explored by MIT Professor Sherry Turkle in her now classic study Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, first published (ironically) in 1984
Highlighted by jimfolk


Public Comment