GOP challenges to new voters set back by courts - Politico.co...
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Public Sticky notes
Individuals who provide information that does not match those documents may face confusion at the polls or be required to vote on a provisional ballot.
But critics of the provision say inaccurate state databases lead to erroneous disqualifications. A study by the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law found that the matching process fails 20 percent to 30 percent of the time due to minor errors like database typos, use of nicknames, and multiple entries.
“The general narrative of what’s going on with a lot of these cases is to attempt to limit the voters to who are participating,” said Georgetown law professor Jonah Goldman, director of the nonpartisan National Campaign for Fair Elections. “The central premise is that more voters help Democrats.”
Republicans, however, say that the databases are a way to increase security at the polls and stop illegal registrations from becoming fraudulent voters.
“Make no mistake, HAVA disenfranchises no one and protects the right to vote,” said Wisconsin Republican State Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen, state chairman of McCain’s campaign. “HAVA checks are an important safeguard — one mandated by Congress and state law — to help make sure those lawful votes are not diluted by unlawful votes.”
Highlighted by cburell
on 2008-10-26 by cburell
NOTE the research by NYU and the following testimony from Georgetown. Then NOTE the opposing viewpoint, from McCain's campaign chairman in Wisconsin. Which parties seem more credible?
Highlighted by cburell
Highlighted by cburell
on 2008-10-26 by cburell
In other words, the faulty registrations at ACORN result in ACORN losing money paid to the dishonest employees. They do NOT result in illegal votes. Read it: Bush commissioned the study that confirms this.
Highlighted by cburell
Highlighted by cburell
on 2008-10-26 by cburell
HILARIOUS.
Highlighted by cburell
on 2008-10-26 by cburell
The cynicism of this one is only matched by its heartlessness. The Michigan GOP wanted to DISENFRANCHISE JOE THE PLUMBERS WHO'D LOST THEIR HOMES DUE TO THE ECONOMIC MELTDOWN. We don't want THEM voting, do we?


Public Comment