A User's Guide to 21st Century Economics - Umair Haque
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 12 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2009-01-09
- Takuya514 on 2009-07-12 - Tags no_tag
- Keyist on 2009-02-21 - Tags business , economics
- Lampertina on 2009-01-18 - Tags umair_haque , harvard_business , analysis , economics , symmetry
- Lisa_simpsonlk on 2009-01-16 - Tags A User's Guide to 21st Century Economics
- Emmfan on 2009-01-13 - Tags hbr , strategy
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by takuya514
Highlighted by takuya514
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by takuya514
Highlighted by lampertina
What is the role of marketing in a world where consumption must slow?
In the 20th century, marketing was the pusher of a consumption addiction
Highlighted by lampertina
What is the role of marketing in a world where consumption must slow?
In the 20th century, marketing was the pusher of a consumption addiction: Madison Ave's game was to create perceived value by "differentiating" the same razors, blades, and toothpaste. At the Lab, we've found that companies who create perceived value are significantly less profitable and more vulnerable than companies who are rethinking marketing to create real value. Think (the awesome) Nike Plus.
Highlighted by takuya514
Highlighted by lampertina
What is the role of distribution in a world where consumption, savings, and investment will accelerate in volatility?
In the 20th century, advantage was attained by seizing or building distribution channels.
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina
What is the role of production in a world where consumption becomes savings?
In the 20th century, economies of mass scale led giant, evil corporations to a cost advantage. The flipside was a world of homogeneous, mass-made widgets overflowing from bleak exurban shelves.
Highlighted by lampertina
What is the role of production in a world where consumption becomes savings?
In the 20th century, economies of mass scale led giant, evil corporations to a cost advantage. The flipside was a world of homogeneous, mass-made widgets overflowing from bleak exurban shelves. At the Lab, we've found that scarcity pays: companies who can rescale production at the micro-level are disproportionately more profitable and powerful. Think (the industry-reshaping) Zara.
Highlighted by takuya514
Highlighted by lampertina
What is the role of strategy in a world where the game is no longer about winning more consumption than rivals?
In the 20th century, strategic thinking helped players "win" wars fought against rivals - the most strategic player "won" the greatest relative share of consumption (market share, mind share, etc).
Highlighted by lampertina
What is the role of strategy in a world where the game is no longer about winning more consumption than rivals?
In the 20th century, strategic thinking helped players "win" wars fought against rivals - the most strategic player "won" the greatest relative share of consumption (market share, mind share, etc). At the Lab, we've found steeply diminishing returns to orthodox strategy - because, like actual war, it destroys tomorrow for today. The 21st century demands a rethink of what's "strategic" - versus what's merely selfish. Think (the eminently anti-strategic) Google.
Highlighted by takuya514
In the 20th century, innovation was about processes, products, and services:
Highlighted by lampertina
Highlighted by lampertina


Public Comment