Skip to main content

Brad's Thoughts on the Social Graph

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

Groups (3)

  • collaboration

    Collaboration

    408 members,806 bookmarks

    Collaboration is an exciting topic given all the changes that the Internet has made in helping people achieve common goals across boundaries. Let's celebrate and document these changes through a great collection of links and comments. Now that's collaboration!!!

  • quorum

    Quorum

    7 members,199 bookmarks

    This is a group for all of us who are already online and using diigo and enjoying anthropology and curious about the world, where it is and where it´s going. Based around, but not limited to, students (current and former) and professors from Kansas State and in the Manhattan, KS area.

  • renosmtt

    Reno Social Media Think Tank

    5 members,97 bookmarks

    A place to share links and comments on current social media marketing, community management and presence marketing trends, products, platforms and ideas. Loosely based on Reno NV and our friends and associates.

Related Lists

Bookmark History

Saved by 83 people (12 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-08-17


Public Comment

on 2007-10-05 by vahidm

Forward thinking... i like it.

Public Sticky notes

What I mean by "social graph" is a the global mapping of everybody and how they're related, as Wikipedia describes and I talk about in more detail later. Unfortunately, there doesn't exist a single social graph (or even multiple which interoperate) that's comprehensive and decentralized. Rather, there exists hundreds of disperse social graphs, most of dubious quality and many of them walled gardens.

Highlighted by stl1021

it'd be: People are getting sick of registering and re-declaring their friends on every site., but also: Developing "Social Applications" is too much work.

Highlighted by mehwolfy

Facebook's answer seems to be that the world should just all be Facebook apps.

Highlighted by mehwolfy

People are getting sick of registering and re-declaring their friends on every site., but also: Developing "Social Applications" is too much work

Highlighted by stl1021

Ultimately make the social graph a community asset, utilizing the data from all the different sites, but not depending on any company or organization as "the" central graph owner.

Highlighted by kjc6688

A centralized "owner" of the social graph is bad for the Internet. I'm not saying anybody should ban Facebook, though!

Highlighted by stl1021

Establish a non-profit and open source software (with copyrights held by the non-profit) which collects, merges, and redistributes the graphs from all other social network sites into one global aggregated graph.

Highlighted by kjc6688

A user should then be able to log into a social application (e.g. dopplr.com) for the first time, ideally but not necessarily with OpenID, and be presented with a dialog like,
"Hey, we see from public information elsewhere that you already have 28 friends already using dopplr, shown below with rationale about why we're recommending them (what usernames they are on other sites). Which do you want to be friends with here? Or click 'select-all'."

Highlighted by kjc6688