» Who is afraid of the GGG? | Web 2.0 Explorer | ZDNet.com
Popularity Report
 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rank
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 4 people (1 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-11-26
- Jekabg on 2008-01-25 - Tags no_tag
- Ronanmurphy on 2007-11-27 - Tags internet , web
- Mobilavenue on 2007-11-26 - Tags semantic_web , social_graph , third_wave
- Skwirrel24 on 2007-11-26 - Tags social , web2.0 , weblog_entry
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by ronanmurphy
So the Net and the Web may both be shaped as something mathematicians call a Graph, but they are at different levels. The Net links computers, the Web links documents.
Highlighted by jekabg
Now, people are making another mental move. There is realization now, ‘It’s not the documents, it is the things they are about which are important
Highlighted by jekabg
Its not the Social Network Sites that are interesting — it is the Social Network itself. The Social Graph. The way I am connected, not the way my Web pages are connected
Highlighted by jekabg
To me, this is a signal from the father of World Wide Web: the Web (or the information on [the] Internet) has started to be reorganized from the traditional publisher-oriented structure to the new viewer-oriented structure
Highlighted by jekabg
A company storing data is not sufficient, it being able to sieve out information from it, transforming it into knowledge, and converting to action is paramount
Highlighted by jekabg
Well, I don’t think we saw something new created last week. What we saw was a restating of some principles at the heart of the Semantic Web, a recognition that the social graph so frequently mentioned in relation to the big Social Networking sites shares many of those principles. Finally, we saw the beginning of an informed discussion that might - finally - see the fruits of many years of Semantic Web research and development surfaced in language that can be used in conversation with the pragmatists building the mainstream Web of today, aligned to technologies and techniques fitting for that Web, rather than simply making the gloomy shadows a bit more pronounced.
Highlighted by mobilavenue
A semantic graph is far more reusable than a non-semantic graph — it’s a graph that carries its own meaning.
Highlighted by jekabg
Simply put, applications that wish to access or integrate data in the Age of the Web can more easily do so using RDF and OWL. That alone is reason enough to use these standards.
Highlighted by jekabg
Of course there are many other benefits as well, such as the ability to do more sophisticated reasoning across the data, but that is less important. Simply making data more accessible, connectable, and reusable across applications would be a huge benefit.
Highlighted by jekabg
Public Comment