Joel Oleson's SharePoint Land : SharePoint Groups, Permission...
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 7 people (-1 private), first by anonymouse user on 2007-07-07
- Codygros on 2009-04-26 - Tags planning , security , sharepoint
- Pndragon on 2009-04-08 - Tags sharepoint , security , permissions
- Jensling on 2009-03-02 - Tags Sharepoint , permissions , security , oleson
- Laflour on 2008-11-05 - Tags SharePoint , Security
- Placebo217 on 2008-10-02 - Tags reference , security , permissions , sharepoint
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by laflour
Highlighted by laflour
Highlighted by laflour
Highlighted by pndragon
Highlighted by placebo217
Highlighted by laflour
Dev Tip from Jim Sturms: You cannot create groups or permission levels declaratively in XML – you’ll need to create these using the OM with a solution.
Although permissions inheritance is easily broken and granularized, I don't recommend it unless you need to. It's a pain to manage, let me tell you. There are a bunch of partners out there that would love to help you manage your site permissions and help you add users across all the sites when someone joins the group. It's a ton better to add security groups and users at the site collection level and use the sharepoint groups and add people to those roles that you see right out of the box. Sure you can break inheritance on special sites, but I'd recommend not making that the rule more the exception.
Highlighted by placebo217
Highlighted by placebo217
TechNet: Plan Site Security
http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/WSS/en/library/700c3d60-f394-4ca9-a6d8-ab597fc3c31b1033.mspx?mfr=true
Managing Permissions and Security
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepointtechnology/CH100649861033.aspx
Role Assignments, Role Definitions, and Inheritance
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms414036.aspx
Users, Groups, and Authorization
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms414400.aspx
Highlighted by placebo217


Public Comment