Sharing Power (Aussie Rules) | the human network
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 9 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2009-05-10
- Psychosophonis on 2009-07-27 - Tags arts1091 , week9 , week10
- Mwesch on 2009-06-03 - Tags pesce , pdf2009 , politics
- Tsuomela on 2009-05-12 - Tags online , culture , model , cloud , motivation , peer-production
- Robinboast on 2009-05-11 - Tags cloud
- Sheasmith on 2009-05-11 - Tags cloud , web2.0 , crowdsource , hypermimesis
Public Sticky notes
The cloud, this new thing, this is really what has Bill Brooks scared, because it is, quite literally, ‘out of control’. It arises naturally out of the human condition of ‘hyperconnection’.
Highlighted by mbogle
It is, instead, rather more subtle and complex. The entire nature of power has changed, as have the burdens of power. Power has always carried with it the ‘burden of omniscience’ – that is, those at the top of the hierarchy have to posses a complete knowledge of everything of importance happening everywhere under their control.
Highlighted by scmorgan
The 21st century will increasingly look like a series of collisions between towers and storms.
Highlighted by scmorgan
any attempt to disrupt the cloud only makes the cloud more resilient.
Highlighted by mbogle
Attacks on the cloud only improve the networks within the cloud, only make the leaders more dedicated, only increase the information and knowledge sharing within the cloud. Trying to disperse a storm only intensifies it.
Highlighted by mbogle
Authority in the cloud is drawn from dedication, or, to use rather more precise language, love. Love is what holds the cloud together. People are attracted to the cloud because they are in love with the aim of the cloud. The cloud truly is an affair of the heart, and these affairs of the heart will be the engines that drive 21st century business, politics and community.
Highlighted by mbogle


Public Comment