IP hypocrisy: US likes WTO rulings only when it wins
Popularity Report
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
URL Tag Cloud
Bookmark History
Saved by 3 people (1 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-03-26
- Jaygreg on 2008-03-29 - Tags US , WTO , fair , international , laws , trade , two-faced
- Terrycojones on 2008-03-28 - Tags ip , us , wto
- Plagiarismtoday on 2008-03-26 - Tags 52 , treaty , united states , wipo , wto
Public Sticky notes
Highlighted by plagiarismtoday
Highlighted by jaygreg
Highlighted by jaygreg
The second case concerns Antigua and Barbuda, a small Caribbean country home to all sorts of online vices, including gambling and DRM circumvention. Antigua took the US to the WTO years ago over charges that the US was unfairly criminalizing access to Antiguan gambling websites while still allowing US-based horse racing sites to function. The WTO ruled against the US on several occasions, including a 2007 ruling that found the US had not yet bothered to comply with previous rulings.
In retaliation, Antigua has announced a radical plan in an attempt to force its larger neighbor to play ball. The Antiguan government has recently stated that it will allow piracy of US intellectual property such as movies and music unless the US changes its gambling policy (though this move has yet to be authorized by the WTO).
Highlighted by jaygreg


Public Comment