Skip to main content

Building a Bridge to the Eighteenth Century

Popularity Report

Total Popularity Score: 0

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Rank

URL Tag Cloud

Bookmark History

Saved by 2 people (0 private), first by anonymouse user on 2008-12-22


Public Sticky notes

Postman offers a wide-ranging perspective on events and trends from 18
th,
19
th
,
and 20
th
centuries. He reminds us, for instance, of the concept of tabula rasa: “Locke
wanted education to result in a rich, varied, and copious book; Rousseau wanted
education to result in a healthy flower. … Children are [today seen as] neither blank
tablets nor budding plants. They are markets; that is to say, consumers whose needs for
products are roughly the same as the needs of adults.” Children are not seen as members
of society with special requirements, but just another market segment.
Postman looks at how the nature of education has changed; he points out some
serious short-comings he finds in contemporary educational practices. Viewed from a
slightly different perspective, children are not simply a market segment but a largely
passive audience for an expanding use of technology. And education’s own increasing
reliance on technology poses a serious short-coming. He writes, “Before the printing
press, children became adults by learning to speak, for which all people are biologically
programmed. After the printing press, children had to earn adulthood by achieving
literacy, for which people are not biologically programmed. This meant that schools had
to be created. … And it is my contention that with the assistance of other media such as
radio, film, and records, television has the power to lead us to childhood’s end. … There
is no need for any preparation or prerequisite training for watching television … .
Watching television requires no skills and develops no skills. That is why there is no
such thing as remedial television-watching.”

Highlighted by cburell

on 2008-12-22 by cburell

I question the TV watching skills. There's much to intelligence "reading" of TV.

What should we do to bring some sense of
integrity (in the sense of integratedness) back into school? Firstly, Postman wants us to
remember the importance of a historical narrative. That narrative provides continuity and
connections and above all context. We don’t have to re-invent ourselves with each new
generation (baby-boomers, baby-busters, Gen-X). We have a long history and a valuable
collection of lessons-learned. We would do well to remember the story and build on it.
On the other hand, we can’t assume that we have discovered The Truth in that narrative.
So, secondly, to balance that narrative we need to introduce (or re-introduce?) critical
thinking into the school curriculum as a useful response to mindless viewing of
technology or listening to the narrative. “Wisdom,” he reminds us, “means knowing
what questions to ask about knowledge. … Wisdom does not imply having the right
answers. It implies only asking the right questions.”

Highlighted by cburell

on 2008-12-22 by cburell

This is why I'm such a huge proponent of narrative history and interdisciplinary studies.

Students need to understand the
need to be both answer-givers and question-askers.

Highlighted by cburell